Madras High Court quashes 85% reservation to TN State Board students in medical admission

Updated - July 14, 2017 11:40 am IST

Published - July 14, 2017 11:04 am IST - CHENNAI

MCI does not distinguish between students from CBSE and State Board, says the petitioner. File photo

MCI does not distinguish between students from CBSE and State Board, says the petitioner. File photo

Justice K. Ravichandra Baabu of the Madras High Court on Friday quashed the government order notified by the State providing 85% reservation for students from State Board in admissions to UG medical courses under State quota.

The judge passed the order on the plea moved by C. Darnish Kumar, a CBSE student, assailing the reservation provided to students from the State Board.

On June 22, the State government notified an order providing 85% reservation in the UG medical seats available in the State quota to the students from State board syllabus and 15% to students from other boards.

Challenging the legality of the move, the petitioner submitted that powers to regulate admission to medical courses lies exclusively with the Medical Council of India (MCI) as per the provisions of the Indian Medical Council Act. The MCI has stipulated that admissions to medical courses shall be based on the marks obtained in NEET and merit list prepared on basis of such marks and it does not distinguish between students from CBSE and State Board.

Click here to read/download a copy of the judgment

Opposing the plea the Advocate General of Tamil Nadu submitted that the State government is still opposing NEET. “Two Bills have been already passed in the State Assembly exempting student from Tamil Nadu from NEET and the same are pending for President’s assent,” he said.

He further pointed out that in Tamil Nadu a maximum of 88,431 students appeared for NEET out of which only 4675 are from CBSE. “Since NEET is the basis of admission, to ensure fair and equal opportunity to candidates from different boards, such reservation is provided in the seats available in the State quota,” he added.

However, refusing to concur with the submissions of the State, Justice Ravichandra Baabu quashed the reservation.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in


Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.