A person cannot be convicted on the basis of statements recorded during investigation, says Madras HC

It says a person cannot be convicted on the basis of statements recorded during investigation

July 24, 2022 12:15 pm | Updated 12:55 pm IST - CHENNAI

Justices S. Vaidyanathan and A.D. Jagadish Chandira held that the trial court had misled itself into a “specious” reasoning that there was corroboration between the medical evidence and the statements of the witnesses recorded by a magistrate.

Justices S. Vaidyanathan and A.D. Jagadish Chandira held that the trial court had misled itself into a “specious” reasoning that there was corroboration between the medical evidence and the statements of the witnesses recorded by a magistrate. | Photo Credit: The Hindu

The Madras High Court on Friday set aside the conviction and life sentence imposed by a trial court in a murder case. It held that it would not be safe to convict the accused when all independent witnesses, including the eyewitnesses and recovery witnesses, had turned hostile during their examination before the trial court.

Justices S. Vaidyanathan and A.D. Jagadish Chandira held that the trial court had misled itself into a “specious” reasoning that there was corroboration between the medical evidence and the statements of the witnesses recorded by a magistrate, during the course of investigation, under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.PC).

The judges said they could not endorse the reasoning given by the trial court to render a conviction against the appellant since the Supreme Court had ruled that a statement recorded by a magistrate during the course of investigation under Section 164 could not be equated with a statement recorded under oath during a judicial proceeding.

Therefore, the judgment of conviction and sentence rendered by the Additional District and Sessions Court in Vellore on September 11, 2018 was liable to be set aside and the appellant was entitled to be acquitted of all charges, the Bench said. It set him at liberty and ordered refunding of the fine amount paid by him.

According to the prosecution, the appellant Siva was a married man who has two daughters. Yet, he was in a live-in relationship with Chinnaponnu of Thiruvalam in Vellore district. He had reportedly forced Chinnaponnu to gift her house to his daughters and this led to a complaint of harassment lodged against him before an all-women police station.

Enraged by the complaint filed by Chinnaponnu, he had hit her with a wooden log and used a knife to cause bleeding injuries. The crime was reportedly witnessed by Chinnaponnu’s niece and two of her neighbours. The police recovered the material evidence through other witnesses.

However, both these eyewitnesses as well as recovery witnesses turned hostile during the trial. Only the official witnesses, which included the police and the forensic experts, had supported the prosecution case. Yet, the trial court recorded conviction by corroborating the 164 statements of witnesses with the medical evidence.

Top News Today

Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.