Land acquisition for Salem-Chennai corridor has to come first: NHAI to SC

‘Vacate HC order for project of national importance’

August 23, 2019 12:26 am | Updated 04:22 am IST - CHENNAI

The ambitious 277.3-km-long eight-lane greenfield project aims to cut travel time between Salem and Chennai.

The ambitious 277.3-km-long eight-lane greenfield project aims to cut travel time between Salem and Chennai.

The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) told the Supreme Court on Thursday that the ₹10,000-crore Salem-Chennai eight-lane greenfield road project was of “national importance” and getting an environmental clearance before land acquisition would be “like putting the cart before the horse”.

The authority urged a Bench, led by Justice N.V. Ramana, to vacate an April 8 order of the Madras High Court, which held that prior environmental clearance was mandatory for the sensitive project.

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, for NHAI, said the protests for environmental clearance at this point of the project was baseless, as the government should be allowed to first acquire the land and then seek green clearance from the authorities concerned. Acquisition comes first, followed by environmental nod.

The High Court’s order had come on a batch of petitions filed by 35 landowners and PMK leader Anbumani Ramadoss. The pleas had challenged the land acquisition proceedings.

The High Court had made clear that grant of prior environmental clearance would undoubtedly require a thorough study of the area and before that, a public hearing was needed to be conducted.

Opposition from locals

The ambitious 277.3-km-long eight-lane greenfield project connecting Salem and Chennai, under the Centre’s ‘Bharatmala Pariyojana’ Scheme, aims to cut travel time between the two cities by half, to about two hours and 15 minutes.

However, it has been facing opposition from a section of locals, including farmers, over fears of losing their land, besides environmentalists who are against felling trees for it.

The project runs through reserve forest and waterbodies.

The High Court had wanted the project report by a consultant to be scrapped.

The court posted the next hearing for September 4.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.