Kodanad is a symbol of betrayal, says Kamal Haasan

January 16, 2019 04:43 pm | Updated November 28, 2021 09:37 am IST - COIMBATORE

Makkal Needhi Maiam founder Kamal Haasan.

Makkal Needhi Maiam founder Kamal Haasan.

Makkal Needhi Maiam founder Kamal Haasan on Wednesday said that the Kodanad Estate (bungalow of former Chief Minister Jayalalithaa) in the Nilgiris was a symbol of betrayal.

Addressing journalists in Pollachi, he said, “It is a symbol of betrayal — a betrayal of people and of themselves.” The Kodanad Estate is in the news following an allegation by a former Tehelka journalist and two accused in a break-in case at the estate, that Chief Minister Edappadi K Palaniswami had a role in the 2017 burglary at Jayalalithaa’s property. The Chief Minister has since denied the allegation.

“What of the allegations that have been proven against the ruling party? It (charge against CM) is not the Opposition parties’ allegations; these are people’s allegations,” he contended when asked about Deputy Chief Minister O. Panneerselvam’s comment that the allegations against Mr. Palaniswami in the Kodanad issue were being levelled with an eye on Lok Sabha elections.

Asked if he wound enter the fray in the Parliamentary elections, Mr. Haasan said: “I cannot comment on whether I will contest or not. The party will decide and as far as alliance is concerned it will be (with) like-minded parties and those who at least wish for corruption to be eradicated.”

His party is committed to reducing unemployment, taking up issuer pertaining to farmers and economically weaker sections and women. It is also for providing free and quality education. The programmes that the party has in mind for implementation is in consonance with its ideology. Mr Haasan said if the programmes did not bring the desired results, the party would change the programmes but that did not mean that its ideology had changed.

Asked about distribution of freebies, Mr. Haasan said to call it freebies was not right. Parties were not giving it out of their pockets. It was people’s money that the governments distributed, he argued.

In response to a question on 10% reservation for economically weaker sections among the forward communities, he said new reservation could be thought about only when the reasons for implementing caste-based reservations did not exist. And, new reservation should not disturb the existing reservation arithmetic.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.