How can Additional Solicitor General appear for Velumani in corruption case: A-G

Cannot restrain him from appearing for ex-Minister as long as Centre does not withdraw permission: HC

September 05, 2022 09:42 pm | Updated 09:42 pm IST - Chennai

The Senior Counsel informed the court that he had obtained the permission of the Centre for taking up the private case.

The Senior Counsel informed the court that he had obtained the permission of the Centre for taking up the private case.

Advocate General (A-G) R. Shunmugasundaram on Monday opposed the appearance of Senior Counsel S.V. Raju, who also holds the post of Additional Solicitor General (ASG), in the Supreme Court on behalf of former Municipal Administration Minister S.P. Velumani in two corruption cases filed against the latter.

Appearing before the first Division Bench of Chief Justice Munishwar Nath Bhandari and Justice N. Mala, the A-G wondered how the ASG could represent the former Minister in the two corruption cases when the Income Tax (I-T) Department had raided the residence of his close aide in July.

However, Mr. Raju, who appeared through a video call, informed the court that he had obtained the permission of the Centre for taking up the private case. Convinced, the Chief Justice told the A-G that the court cannot prevent him from appearing in the case as long as the Centre does not withdraw the permission.

When Mr. Shunmugasundaram said the Directorate of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption (DVAC) would write to the Centre for withdrawing the permission, the CJ replied that it was up to the agency to pursue a remedy. “It will be well within your rights to do that, but till permission is withdrawn, we will not restrain him,” he said.

Later, the judges decided to pass orders in a couple of days on the question of maintainability raised by the DVAC with respect to two criminal original petitions filed by the former Minister to quash an FIR registered in Chennai in August 2021 and another FIR registered in Coimbatore in March this year.

The DVAC had contended that the quash petitions must be listed only before a single judge who holds the portfolio of hearing cases pending against legislators, and not before the Division Bench, which was hearing a public interest litigation petition filed against the former Minister by the NGO Arappor Iyakkam in 2018.

Top News Today

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.