HC stays single judge’s order against dissolution of TNCPCR

AAG argues that members of the dissolved child rights commission can also apply when it is reconstituted

September 15, 2022 11:41 pm | Updated 11:41 pm IST - CHENNAI

The AAG said, it was not a case of disqualifying an individual member but a case of dissolving the entire Tamil Nadu Commission for Protection of Child Rights and reconstituting it afresh.

The AAG said, it was not a case of disqualifying an individual member but a case of dissolving the entire Tamil Nadu Commission for Protection of Child Rights and reconstituting it afresh. | Photo Credit: PICHUMANI K

A Division Bench of the Madras High Court on Thursday stayed the operation of an order passed by a single judge who had on July 13 quashed a Government Order dissolving Tamil Nadu Commission for Protection of Child Rights (TNCPCR) since the government had decided to appoint a new chairperson and members.

The first Bench of Acting Chief Justice M. Duraiswamy and Sunder Mohan granted the interim stay following an urgent writ appeal preferred by the government with a delay of 30 days. The judges condoned the delay, admitted the appeal, granted the interim stay and adjourned the matter to be heard on October 10.

The Bench prima facie concurred with the submissions of Additional Advocate General J. Ravindran that the single judge had mistaken that the council had been dissolved by invoking Section 7 of the Commission for Protection of Child Rights Act of 2005 though the government had actually invoked Section 16 of the General Clauses Act of 1897.

The AAG told the court that a G.O. had originally been issued on January 18, 2021 appointing a chairperson and six members to the TNCPCR. They were appointed for a tenure of three years which would come to an end in January 2024. However, in February this year, the government decided to dissolve the entire commission.

The decision was taken in order to reconstitute the commission with “vibrant, dynamic and enthusiastic” people. Accordingly, a Government Order was issued on February 23 this year cancelling the January 18, 2021 order. Some of the members challenged the February G.O. and got it quashed in July this year.

Assailing the single judge’s order, the AAG said, it was not a case of disqualifying an individual member but a case of dissolving the entire Commission and reconstituting it afresh. He said that the members of the dissolved commission could also reapply as and when the government issues a notification for reconstitution.

Ends

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.