HC quashes FIR against YouTuber Maridhas

According to the judge, Maridhas had only questioned the "irresponsible conduct" of the attendees of the Tablighi Jamaat congregation.

Published - December 23, 2021 04:56 pm IST - Madurai

YouTube app is seen on a smartphone. File

YouTube app is seen on a smartphone. File

The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court on Thursday quashed the FIR registered by the Melapalayam police in Tirunelveli against YouTuber Maridhas.

The Melapalayam police had booked Maridhas based on a complaint lodged by the Tamil Nadu Muslim Munnetra Kazhagam functionary Mohammed Khader Meeran. The YouTuber was booked under various Sections of the Indian Penal Code.

The complainant said that Mr. Maridhas had linked the Tablighi Jamaat’s conference held in Delhi to the outbreak of COVID-19 in Delhi and other parts of the country and had called it a new form of terrorism. The petitioner denied the allegations levelled against him.

Justice G.R. Swaminathan said the YouTuber had made the video presentation during the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic. “No part of his speech questioned the beliefs of Muslims.”

According to the judge, he had only questioned the "irresponsible conduct" of the attendees of the congregation. The judge was of the view that a careful reading of the presentation would tell that he was alarmed by the incident. He called upon the attendees to get themselves checked for COVID-19 in hospitals.

Quashing the FIR registered against the petitioner Maridhas, the judge said a sharp criticism of an organisation cannot attract the provisions.

During the course of the hearing, the State submitted that the investigation was at an early stage and should not be scuttled. “Anyone watching the offending video could develop ill will towards the Muslims.”

The counsel representing the de facto complainant pointed out that the YouTuber had not removed the video and lakhs of people had watched it. He had constantly referred to the outbreak of COVID-19 to the Tablighi Jamaat conference in the video.

The counsel for the petitioner contended that there was no ill feeling towards anyone.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in


Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.