Graft charges against OPS: HC directs DVAC to complete probe ‘expeditiously’

The matter pertains to a complaint lodged by DMK MP R.S. Bharathi in March.

July 25, 2018 07:31 pm | Updated November 28, 2021 08:41 am IST - Chennai

O. Panneerselvam. File

O. Panneerselvam. File

Spelling trouble for Tamil Nadu Deputy Chief Minister, O. Panneerselvam, the Madras High Court on Wednesday directed the Directorate of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption (DVAC) to complete a preliminary probe “as expeditiously as possible” into a complaint lodged against him for allegedly amassing wealth above his known sources of income.

The complaint was lodged by DMK MP R.S. Bharathi in March on behalf of his party.

When the matter came up before Justice Jayachandran, Advocate General Vijay Narayan, who appeared on behalf of the State government, said as per a circular dated July 18, a preliminary inquiry had been ordered based on the information furnished by Mr. Bharathi.


Justice G. Jayachandran disposed of petitions filed by Mr. Bharathi and another one by an organisation named ‘Arappor Iyakkam’ represented by Jairam Venkatesh seeking a direction to the DVAC to probe the complaint.

”...the inquiry has to be completed as expeditiously as possible...,” the judge said.

“In so far as other petition by Arappor Iyakkam is concerned, the information furnished will be taken note of in the case of investigation,” he said.

‘Benami properties’

In his petition, Mr. Bharathi alleged that the senior AIADMK leader had amassed wealth by abusing his power gained unlawfully and invested the same in companies and properties either in his name or that of his “benamis”.

He alleged that for this purpose, Mr. Panneerselvam made false declarations before the Income Tax authorities and election officials.

Alleging that the DVAC had not acted on his complaint till date, the petitioner said the High Court had made it clear that when a complaint was given against a public servant, the vigilance department had to look into it directly and that no prior sanction was needed.

Referring to the various lands owned by Mr. Panneerselvam, the petitioner alleged that in his election affidavit, the Deputy Chief  minister had not disclosed details of the plots and the income earned from them, which had to be investigated.

Land valued at more than ₹140 crore was leased out to benamis of OPS, the petitioner alleged.

He also alleged that Mr. Panneerselvam’s son was a director in many companies and they had purchased several acres worth over ₹ 68 crore.

Mr. Bharathi sought a direction to the DVAC to register a case and investigate the complaint against the Deputy Chief Minister.

The court had earlier asked the anti-graft body to explain why no probe was initiated even three months after a complaint was lodged against Mr. Panneerselvam.

It also sought to know why a CBI probe should not be ordered into the allegations against the AIADMK leader.

Top News Today

Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in


Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.