Qatar World Cup 2022Portugal beats Uruguay 2-0, qualifies for round of 16

First Division Bench decides to hear FIR quash petitions filed by SP Velumani

Also refuses to restrain Additional Solicitor General from appearing for the former Minister until Centre withdraws permission

September 07, 2022 11:41 pm | Updated September 08, 2022 03:30 am IST - Chennai

The court rejected the DVAC’s contention that the pleas must be listed only before a Bench holding portfolio for hearing cases related to past and present legislators.

The court rejected the DVAC’s contention that the pleas must be listed only before a Bench holding portfolio for hearing cases related to past and present legislators.

The first Division Bench of the Madras High Court on Wednesday decided to continue to hear criminal original petitions filed by former Municipal Administration Minister S.P. Velumani of All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam to quash two First Information Reports (FIRs) registered against him on corruption charges.

Chief Justice Munishwar Nath Bhandari and Justice N. Mala rejected the objection raised by Directorate of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption (DVAC) which contended that the quash petitions should be listed only before a single judge or before a Division Bench holding the portfolio for hearing cases related to past and present legislators.

Since a connected public interest litigation petition filed by Jayaram Venkatesan of non governmental organisation Arappor Iyakkam in 2018 was being heard by the first Division Bench, it would be better for the same Bench to hear the quash petitions too to avoid conflicting decisions in the matter, the Chief Justice said.

The Bench also rejected objections with respect to the appearance of senior counsel S.V. Raju, who was an Additional Solicitor General in the Supreme Court, on behalf of Mr. Velumani before the High Court in the quash petitions. It said, the court could not prevent his appearance until the Centre withdraws the permission granted to him.

Further, the Bench directed the High Court Registry to list the quash petitions for hearing on Friday since the petitioner insisted on staying the investigation in the two corruption cases. Though the court had already restrained the DVAC from filing a final report, the Bench said, it would take a call as to whether the interim order should be continued or withdrawn.

Top News Today

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.