Deep-sea fishing no solution: Fisherfolk

Say they will find it difficult to pay ₹8 lakh from their pocket; Jayakumar promises to tweak scheme

July 31, 2017 12:35 am | Updated 12:35 am IST - CHENNAI

Thoothukudi, Tamil Nadu, 11/05/2017: STANDALONE: The 61-day annual ban on deep sea fishing by mechanised boats along the east coast of Tamil Nadu, is the ideal duration for country boat fishermen in Thoothukudi to make abundant catches. Photo: N. Rajesh

Thoothukudi, Tamil Nadu, 11/05/2017: STANDALONE: The 61-day annual ban on deep sea fishing by mechanised boats along the east coast of Tamil Nadu, is the ideal duration for country boat fishermen in Thoothukudi to make abundant catches. Photo: N. Rajesh

Last week, Prime Minister Narendra Modi formally launched the project to promote deep-sea fishing among Ramanathapuram fishermen by handing over work orders to five fishermen for the construction of tuna long-liners with gill nets.

Deep-sea fishing, a project of the Central and State governments, has been touted as the remedy for the problems faced by fishermen of Ramanathapuram district in the hands of the Sri Lankan Navy.

Recently, Sri Lanka had passed a law banning bottom trawling in its territorial waters in the Palk Bay. But many fishermen are apprehensive that the assistance package being offered for them to transition to deep-sea fishing does not address all their concerns.

P. Jesuraj, a prominent leader of the fisherfolk of Ramanathapuram, feels that the norms of the project regarding beneficiary contribution are not realistic. “We have been hit very badly because of Sri Lankan authorities frequently arresting our fishermen and impounding our boats. Fishing days in the Palk Bay have gone down drastically over the years.

Under such circumstances, it would be a huge burden for us to make the contribution of ₹8 lakh, accounting for 10% of the cost of every tuna long-liner cum gill netter boat,” he said.

Discussion held

Pointing out that his brother is one of the beneficiaries chosen for the deep-sea fishing project, Mr. Jesuraj says that the fishermen would find it extremely difficult to provide collateral security to banks for loans as they do not have high value immoveable assets.

Fishermen will also find it difficult to adhere to the stipulation of selling their trawlers and meeting their contribution, he said.

Responding to the concerns of the fisherfolk, Fisheries Minister D. Jayakumar told The Hindu that “the project will be fine-tuned if our attention is drawn to hurdles in the implementation of the project.”

A senior official in the State Fisheries Department explains that the share of beneficiary contribution is a mere 10% of the cost of every boat while the Central government will meet 50% of the cost and the State government, 20%. The remaining 20% will be through institutional finance or loan component.

Originally, the loan component was 30% and the share of the State, 10%. The changes have been made so that fishermen-beneficiaries are not put to much hardship.

No collateral needed

Besides, the fishermen have to chip in their contribution only at a later stage.

The norms on beneficiary contribution were finalised after holding discussion with the fishing community, he said.

As for collateral security, the State Level Bankers’ Committee has clarified that banks need not insist on this form of security as the loan component is only a small portion of the total cost.

The department official adds that as part of the “de-escalation” of the conflict in the Palk Bay, no new trawler will be allowed to be registered in the Bay. This follows a “request” from fishermen from five districts including Ramanathapuram, Pudukottai and Nagapattinam.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.