CBSE decisions cannot have any bearing on State Board schools, says Madras HC

Dismisses a plea to quash a 2021 G.O. through which all class X students were declared to have passed without issuing individual mark statements

May 02, 2022 11:56 pm | Updated 11:56 pm IST - Chennai

The Madras High Court has refused to accept an argument that since the Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE) had awarded marks for class X students, on the basis of internal assessment, despite not conducting the Board examinations due to COVID-19 lockdown last year, the State Board schools could also follow suit.

Chief Justice Munishwar Nath Bhandari and Justice D. Bharatha Chakravarthy wrote: “The CBSE is a different examination Board and their decision cannot mandate the State Government to change its policy decision and more specifically to award the marks without an examination which otherwise would not be appropriate.”

The judges also said that it was not only Tamil Nadu but many other States too had taken a similar decision to simply declare all Class X students to have passed the Board examinations during the pandemic period without awarding specific marks for each subject that they had studied online during the lockdown.

“We do not find any illegality in the policy decision of the State Government so as to cause interference in the Government Order issued on July 26, 2021. Marks can be awarded in case of examination where performance of student is assessed but cannot be in a case where no examination was conducted,” the Bench added.

The judgment was passed while dismissing a writ appeal preferred by a girl student who had completed Class X in Tamil Nadu and wanted to join Class XI in Kerala. It was her case that the schools in Kerala insist on producing the Class X mark statement as a prerequisite to grant admission in Class XI.

The Division Bench took note that the appellant had already approached the Kerala High Court and obtained an order to gain admission in Class XI without a mark statement. Therefore, they held that they did not find any necessity to interfere with a single judge’s decision to dismiss her writ petition challenging the July 2021 G.O.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.