Atheist-reformist movement that preceded ‘Periyar’

It is a mystery why the reformist initiative faded into oblivion

Updated - November 08, 2012 09:31 am IST - CHENNAI:

A page from the English journal ''The Thinker'' which was run by the Madras Secular Society between 1878 and 1888.

A page from the English journal ''The Thinker'' which was run by the Madras Secular Society between 1878 and 1888.

Many decades before ‘Periyar’ E.V. Ramsamy launched his self-respect movement (1925) and propagated atheism, the erstwhile Madras presidency had seen a well-organised atheist-reformist movement (1878-88), which later faded into oblivion.

The Hindu Free Thought Union, a movement launched in 1878, took inspiration from the London-based Anti-Church Movement of Charles Bradlaugh. In the middle of 1886, it was renamed Madras Secular Society (Chennai Loukeeka Sangam).

“Now there is a need to rewrite the history of the reformist and atheist movement in Tamil Nadu. There is a strong case for shifting the focus of the movement from Bengal-centric perspective,” said V. Arasu, head of the department of Tamil, Madras University, who has traced the history of the movement and collected journals published by it.

But, there is no information available as to who launched and ran the movement and why it suddenly disappeared. P. Munesawmy Naicker was the manager of the two journals run by the society and there are references to P. Appathoaray Chettiayar , identified as the secretary. One Masilamany Mudaliar had written extensively. “The journals, one in English and another in Tamil, advocated atheism, pro-labour policies, women’s education, widow-remarriage and strongly condemned the four-varna system,” said Dr. Arasu, who first came across ‘Thathuvavivesini,’ the Tamil journal, in the Prof Anbazhagan library in Anna Arivalayam. The English journal was called ‘The Thinker’.

Through the journals the members of the society waged a relentless battle with the advocates of religion and god.

While the free thinkers strongly opposed Vaishnavites, Saivites and Christians, they were equally critical of Theosophy, saying it was propagated by Brahmins.

The journals carried articles on Western thinkers, including Thomas Paine, Spinoza, Voltaire and Ingersoll. The society also gave enormous attention to Darwin’s theory.

Both ‘Thathuvavivesini,’ and ‘The Thinker,’ however, adopted a sober language while joining issue with their rivals. Responding to the claim of Tamil scholar Sabapathy Navalar that “‘athma’ resides in man’s head,” ‘Thathuvavivesini,’ notes pungently, “the head accommodates brain, veins, blood and flesh.”

It went on to ask: “When did ‘athma’ enter our brain? When we are in our mother’s womb or after we are born?” Nothing abusive or coarse. Prof Arasu said he collected some issues from V. Anaimuthu, a Periyar scholar, some as micro-film from Nehru Memorial Library in Delhi and some from Calcutta. He has already released the first volume of ‘Thathuvavivesini’ and ‘The Thinker’ and is working on four more.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.