Adheenam claims Stalin has consented to ‘Pattina Pravesam’

District administration has not yet issued any order in this regard, say sources

May 08, 2022 02:39 pm | Updated 03:58 pm IST - MAYILADUTHURAI

CHENNAI, MAY 7, 2022

Pontiffs and representatives of various adheenams meeting Chief Minister M.K. Stalin in Chennai on Saturday. 

CHENNAI, MAY 7, 2022 Pontiffs and representatives of various adheenams meeting Chief Minister M.K. Stalin in Chennai on Saturday.  | Photo Credit: SPECIAL ARRANGEMENT

The seer of Dharmapuram Aadheenam claimed on Sunday that Chief Minister M.K. Stalin had permitted conduct of ‘Pattina Pravesam’ (a palanquin-bearing ceremony) of the mutt, “acknowledging significance of the tradition”.

In deference to the stress laid by a delegation of pontiffs across the State on revoking the recent ban imposed on the tradition, the Chief Minister had, on Saturday night, accorded his consent for the event, Sri La Sri Masilamani Desiga Gananasambanda Paramacharya Swamigal claimed during an interaction with mediapersons.

Recently, the Mayiladuthurai RDO, citing human rights violation in the practice of carrying the pontiff on a palanquin, had issued an order banning the ceremony. This had triggered an outcry from votaries of tradition.

At the time of filing this report, official sources said the district administration had not yet issued any order revoking the ban.

Speaking to mediapersons on the sidelines of the Kumbabishegam of Uthavedeeswarar temple at Kuthalam that is managed by the Dharmapuram Adheenam, the 27th Gurumahasannidhanam of the mutt showered his blessings on the Chief Minister, and appreciated the initiative by HR and CE Minister P.K. Sekar Babu to resolve the issue.

Accompanied by the 24th Gurumahasannidhanam of Thiruvavaduthurai Adheenam Sri La Sri Ambalavana Desiga Paramacharya Swamigal, Sengol Adheenam and Thondaimandala Adheenam, the ‘Adheenakartar’ of the Dharpauram Adheenam, said the government had taken a consistent stand in following matters of tradition, adding: “Devotees carry the palanquin on own volition after ‘penance’. There is no question of human rights violation,” he contended.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.