Services of Additional Public Prosecutor terminated

April 26, 2011 01:14 am | Updated 01:14 am IST - MADURAI:

The State government has terminated the services of Additional Public Prosecutor (APP) S.P. Samuel Raj, attached to the Madras High Court Bench here, who was arrayed as an accused in a dowry death case under the investigation of the CB-CID.

A Government Order issued by Public (Law Officers) Department on Wednesday read that the services of the APP were terminated with immediate effect and he would be paid retainer fee at the rate of Rs.12,000 per month in lieu of the three months notice.

Mr. Samuel Raj was in the news last year following the death of his daughter-in-law Nishana Jebamalar who consumed poison in her parental home on April 19 last year, barely ten months from her marriage with the APP's son S. Calvin Christopher on July 2, 2009.

On July 30, 2010, the Madras High Court Bench here transferred the investigation into the dowry death case from the Oomachikulam Police here to the CB-CID pursuant to a petition filed by the victim's mother levelling allegations of favouritism against the police officers.

Then, Justice R. Mala held that the local police had left some loopholes in the investigation to facilitate the accused escape from the clutches of law. She felt that the investigation must be transferred to the CB-CID.

“Furthermore… since the second accused is an APP, the police officers are approaching him on a day-to-day basis for giving instructions to conduct cases in the High Court. Hence, the petitioner suspects that she will not get fair investigation and her fear appears to be a genuine one,” the judge had said.

Ms. Justice Mala recorded the petitioner's claim that her daughter was given in marriage along with 102 sovereigns of gold jewellery. Yet, she was allegedly harassed and ill-treated by her in-laws, who demanded Rs.5 lakh in cash and a car.

The petitioner also claimed that her daughter underwent plastic surgery twice as her husband complained about the shape of her nose.

He was not satisfied with both the surgeries and drover her out of the house.

However, the APP stoutly denied the allegations while obtaining anticipatory bail in the case.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.