Supreme Court orders govt to pay ₹1 lakh compensation to ex-RAW officer

She attempted suicide in 2008 after her sexual harassment complaint was casually dealt with

April 25, 2020 12:57 pm | Updated 12:57 pm IST - NEW DELHI:

A view of the Supreme Court of India.

A view of the Supreme Court of India.

The Supreme Court has ordered the government to pay ₹1 lakh as compensation to a former woman intelligence officer with the Research and Analysis Wing, who attempted suicide outside the Prime Minister’s Office in 2008 after her sexual harassment complaint was casually dealt with.

A Bench led by Justice A.M. Khanwilkar appreciated the officer for her dignified conduct of her case in court and held that she had suffered “exceedingly insensitive and undignified circumstances due to improper handling of her complaint of sexual harassment”.

The court invoked the public law remedy of ordering compensation to make up for the indignity meted out to her. In this context, Justice Khanwilkar, in his 92-page verdict on Friday, referred to how the court had ordered compensation to former scientist S. Nambi Narayanan, who was framed by the police in the infamous Indian Space Research Organisation spy scandal.

The woman officer lodged the complaint against her seniors in August 2007. However, a committee was set up only three months, that too, after a written complaint to the Prime Minister’s Officer (PMO). This committee, which was later found to be improperly constituted, gave an ex-parte finding against her. The committee report led to the incident outside the PMO.

Besides, the court frowned upon the government’s move to issue an official press note that touched upon her “psychological condition” in connection with the incident then. A second committee led by an IAS officer was constituted only after her attempted suicide.

The court held that “ Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace Act , 2013 and Convention on Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) predicates that a non-hostile working environment is the basic limb of a dignified employment”.

Sexual harassment at workplace is not just confined to sexual acts alone but also extends to prejudice, hostility, discriminatory attitude and humiliation shown to a woman staffer in the day-to-day office functioning.

“Denial of timely inquiry and by a competent forum inevitably results in denial of justice and violation of fundamental rights,” Justice Khanwilkar observed.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.