Supreme Court bats for women officers in armed forces

Asks government to desist from litigation on ensuring their benefits

January 29, 2021 08:54 pm | Updated 08:54 pm IST - NEW DELHI

In its judgment on February last year, the apex court had dismissed views that women were physiologically weaker than men as a “sex stereotype”.

In its judgment on February last year, the apex court had dismissed views that women were physiologically weaker than men as a “sex stereotype”.

The Supreme Court on Friday urged the government to provide relief to women who served as officers in the Short Service Commission of the defence forces without dragging them into litigation before the Armed Forces Tribunal (AFT).

“They are your own officers. They have served the Navy and the Army. Please try to sort it out with the authorities. Why push them into the litigation cycle again? They are in their years of retirement now,” a Bench led by Justice D.Y. Chandrachud addressed the government side led by Additional Solicitor General Sanjay Jain.

The court said the government and Mr. Jain should sit down and sort the problems out rather than take it to the Tribunal.

The court said it would ideally not like to intervene now after pronouncing a judgment opening the doors for women officers to permanent commission in the defence forces, on par with their male counterparts.

In its judgment on February last year, the apex court had dismissed views that women were physiologically weaker than men as a “sex stereotype”.

The Bench said the judgment has to be adhered to in letter and spirit.

In October last year, the court had expressed annoyance at the roadblocks faced by women officers on the way to permanent commission, promotion and consequential benefits, saying it showed a “difference in thinking” between the highest levels of leadership in the country and the Army bureaucracy.

“There is a different thinking that permeates the highest levels of leadership in the country and a different thinking in the bureaucracy of the Army. Bureaucracy is thinking how can these women protect the nation... We have to bridge the gap,” Justice Chandrachud had observed orally then during a hearing.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.