Supreme Court asks Maharashtra govt. to grant licenses to 8 dance bars by May 12

May 10, 2016 08:34 pm | Updated November 17, 2021 04:26 am IST - New Delhi

In October 2015, the Supreme Court had stayed a provision in the Maharashtra Police Act prohibiting dance performances in beer parlours and hotels. File photo

In October 2015, the Supreme Court had stayed a provision in the Maharashtra Police Act prohibiting dance performances in beer parlours and hotels. File photo

The Supreme Court on Tuesday directed Maharashtra government to grant licenses to eight dance bars within two days and asked them to give an undertaking that they would not engage employees with criminal antecedents near the dance area.

“It is directed that an undertaking shall be given by appellants who have filed application that they shall not engage employees in the bar and dance area whose names have been mentioned in the affidavit given by the State. The undertaking shall be issued by tomorrow and the licenses shall be issued by day after tomorrow,” a bench comprising Justices Dipak Misra and Shiva Kirti Singh said.

Maharashtra government had filed an affidavit in the court informing the bench that they had not granted licenses to eight dance bars as they found some of their employees with criminal antecedents.

Senior advocate Jayant Bhushan, appearing for Indian Hotel and Restaurant Association, said not a single license has been issued till date.

He submitted that as FIR has been lodged against some employees of the bars, licenses were not being issued to them on the ground that they have criminal antecedents.

“Unless a person is convicted under the offence, he cannot be termed as a criminal. The licenses are being delayed on one pretext on the other,” he said.

On the issue of increasing the height of railing adjacent to the dance stage, Mr. Bhushan told the bench that such deficiencies have been addressed.

During the hearing, one of the counsel said that criminal antecedents of dancers should also be looked into and conditions be imposed on them.

The court took strong note of this and said “are you trying to convey to us that they are criminals? Nobody can earn livelihood if they are convicted. We want to save the dignity of women,” the bench said, adding, “You want to take away means of their livelihood. Dignity of women has to be maintained and no obscenity of any kind would be allowed.”

The court has fixed the matter for further hearing on May 13.

Top News Today

Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.