SC lawyers’ body plea to declare NJAC invalid

January 06, 2015 12:22 am | Updated November 16, 2021 09:52 pm IST - NEW DELHI:

The Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association (SCAORA) on Monday filed a writ petition seeking a declaration that the Constitution 99th Amendment Act, 2014, providing constitutional status to the National Judicial Appointments Commission, is “invalid, void and unconstitutional”.

The association had, in August last year, challenged the NJAC law. But a Bench led by Justice Anil R. Dave had said it was too premature as the States were yet to ratify it. However, the Supreme Court had given the association liberty to approach it at a later stage.

The NJAC, which restores the political class’s role in the appointment of judges to the Supreme Court and the High Courts, received the President’s assent last week after ratification by 16 State legislatures. Both the Constitution Amendment Bill and the NJAC Bill were passed by Parliament in August 2014.

The petition, filed by SCAORA and its secretary and Supreme Court advocate Vipin Nair late on Monday evening, is settled by senior advocate Fali Nariman.

The petition contends that by passing the NJAC Bill, Parliament had “altered the basic structure of the Constitution” and encroached into judicial independence.

“Independence of the judiciary includes the necessity to eliminate political influence even at the stage of appointment of a judge,” the petition said.

It said the amendment, as passed by the two houses of Parliament, “takes away the primacy of the collective opinion of the Chief Justice of India and the two senior most Judges of the Supreme Court of India”.

Although the six-member Commission had the CJI as chairperson and two seniormost Supreme Court judges as members, there was no “primacy” for them. Even their collective recommendation of a candidate as judge could be frozen if any two non-judicial members on the panel vetoed it.

The petition said the NJAC Act did not give any “suitability criteria” for appointment as judge, leaving it to the Commission to frame them. It sought a return to the recommendations of the 2002 Justice M.N. Venkatachaliah Committee in which the NJAC was composed of five members.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.