SC issues notice to lawyer who claims he was offered ₹1.5 crore to 'frame' CJI

Supreme Court advocate Utsav Bains claims that a man identified as ‘Ajay’ had approached him to file a “false case of sexual harassment” against Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi

April 23, 2019 11:39 am | Updated 02:21 pm IST - New Delhi

Supreme Court lawyer Utsav Bains. Photo: Twitter/@utsavbains

Supreme Court lawyer Utsav Bains. Photo: Twitter/@utsavbains

A Special Bench of the Supreme Court, led by Justice Arun Mishra, on Tuesday issued notice to an advocate who filed a plea in the court claiming he was offered up to Rs. 1.5 crore by a man who identified himself as “Ajay” to frame a “false case of sexual harassment” against Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi.

The Bench, also comprising Justices Rohinton Nariman and Deepak Gupta, ordered lawyer Utsav Bains to be personally present in the court at 10.30 a.m. on April 24.

“Where is Mr. Utsav Singh Bains?” Justices Mishra and Nariman called out. However, the lawyer was not present in the courtroom.


The thickly packed courtroom had senior advocates Indira Jaising and Rajeev Dhavan and Attorney General K.K. Venugopal, among others.

Mr. Bains had claimed that the man who met him said he represented the former employee who has levelled allegations against Chief Justice Gogoi and asked him to arrange a press conference at the Press Club of India to “frame” the CJI.

Mr. Bains said he refused the man, who became evasive when asked how he was related to the woman.

Mr. Bains said a larger “conspiracy” was being played out to compel the CJI to resign. A judicial inquiry was required into the alleged plot to affect the independence of the judiciary.

The lawyer said he learnt from a “reliable person” who, on the condition of anonymity, told him that a “corporate figure” had tried and failed with the CJI “to get a favourable order in a high profile case”. This person had also tried unsuccessfully to get the case transferred.

This corporate figure had then “ganged up” with an “alleged fixer” to frame the CJI to “pressurise him to resign”, he said.

Top News Today

Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in


Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.