SC dismisses plea to protect Ramjanmabhoomi remains, artefacts

July 20, 2020 01:36 pm | Updated November 28, 2021 12:45 pm IST - New Delhi

A worker polishes a model of a temple at the Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas workshop in Ayodhya on December 6, 2018.

A worker polishes a model of a temple at the Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas workshop in Ayodhya on December 6, 2018.

The Supreme Court on Monday dismissed as “absolutely frivolous” a plea to protect ancient remains and artefacts recovered during excavation and levelling of land at Ramjanmabhoomi in Ayodhya for Ram temple construction.

A Bench led by Justice Arun Mishra ordered petitioners, including Satish Chindhuji Shambharkar, represented by senior advocate Menaka Guruswamy and advocate Prashant Dahat, to pay ₹1 lakh each in costs.

 

Justice Mishra said the petitions were a ruse “to get rid” of the November 19 verdict of the court in the Ayodhya case in which the title for Ramjanmabhumi went completely over to Hindus. The court threatened to order a CBI probe against the petitioners.

The petition said “the remains, artefacts, antiquities and monuments” recovered from the Ramjanmabhumi site in May 2020 at the time of levelling, digging and excavating should be acquired from the Chairman, Ram Janmabhumi Teerth. They should then be protected and conserved as per the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958.

“The artefacts which are found during digging and levelling of land are under grave apprehension of being destroyed, damaged or modified. There is a likelihood that the similar monuments shall be unearthed during the process of levelling and excavating the land and therefore, directions for supervision of excavation by the Archeological Survey of India”, the plea stated.

On November 9, settling a fractious issue that goes back more than a century, the Supreme Court in a historic verdict backed the construction of a Ram temple by a trust at the disputed site in Ayodhya, and ruled that an alternative five-acre plot must be found for a mosque in the same town.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.