SC asks Centre to inform in 10 days time frame for appointing Lokpal

The Bench has posted the matter for hearing on July 17.

July 02, 2018 12:52 pm | Updated 09:55 pm IST - New Delhi

Social activist Anna Hazare during an indefinite hunger strike against the Central government, demanding a competent Lokpal and better production cost for farm produce, at Ramlila Maidan in New Delhi on March 25, 2018.

Social activist Anna Hazare during an indefinite hunger strike against the Central government, demanding a competent Lokpal and better production cost for farm produce, at Ramlila Maidan in New Delhi on March 25, 2018.

The Supreme Court on Monday asked the government to file an affidavit in the next 10 days, detailing the steps it would take for the appointment of Lokpal, the anti-graft ombudsman.

A Bench of Justices Ranjan Gogoi and R. Banumathi scheduled the next hearing of the case for July 17.

It has been constantly urging the government to complete the process of appointment at the earliest. In May, the Lokpal selection committee, led by the Prime Minister, had appointed former Attorney-General Mukul Rohatgi as eminent jurist to the panel that will short-list candidates.

Besides the Prime Minister, the selection committee is composed of the Chief Justice of India and the Lok Sabha Speaker.

Passed in 2014, the Lokpal and Lokayukta Act, 2013, was not implemented all these years because there was no Leader of the Opposition (LoP) in the 16th Lok Sabha. The 2013 law includes the LoP as a member of the selection committee. The Act intends the LoP to be part of the selection committee, which has to first appoint an eminent jurist among their ranks.

However, on April 27 last year, the Supreme Court clarified that the appointment process need not be stalled merely because of the absence of the LoP. The judgment dismissed the government’s reasoning that the appointment process should wait till the Act was amended to replace the LoP with the leader of the single largest Opposition party.

The hearing before Justice Gogoi’s Bench is based on a contempt petition filed by Common Cause, represented by advocate Prashant Bhushan, for not implementing the April, 2017 judgment of the court.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.