Parliament proceedings | Rajya Sabha passes IBC, mineral law Bills

Sitharamn says need for amendment in Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code arose because of ‘changing requirement’

March 12, 2020 10:29 pm | Updated 10:33 pm IST - New Delhi

In this video grab made out of RSTV, Home Minister Amit Shah speaks in Rajya Sabha during the ongoing Budget Session of Parliament, in New Delhi on March 12, 2020.

In this video grab made out of RSTV, Home Minister Amit Shah speaks in Rajya Sabha during the ongoing Budget Session of Parliament, in New Delhi on March 12, 2020.

After days of disruption, the Rajya Sabha on Thursday passed two Bills —The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (Amendment) Bill, 2020 and The Mineral Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2020 .

Parliament proceedings, as it happened on March 12, 2020

The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) Amendment Bill, that will help ring-fence successful bidders of insolvent companies from the risk of criminal proceedings for offences committed by previous promoters, was passed by the Lok Sabha on March 6. The Bill replaces an ordinance.

The IBC, which came into force in 2016, has already been amended thrice. Introducing the Bill , Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman said the Bill was an exact replica of the ordinance and the changes recommended by the Standing Committee of Finance would be incorporated later.

The Minister said the need for amendment in the IBC arose because of the “changing requirement” and “requirement of fine tuning” the law.

‘This is euthanasia’

Opening the debate on the Bill, Congress member Jairam Ramesh said only 10% of defaulted loans had been recovered other than seven big ones to be resolved so far. The law was brought to find a way to keep the firms afloat. However, Mr. Ramesh pointed out that out of 970 cases referred to the IBC, 780 had been liquidated, indicating a mortality rate of 80%. “This is euthanasia,” he said.

Mr. Ramesh said that against admitted claims of ₹3.51 lakh crore, ₹1.50 lakh crore had been recovered by way of auctioning the defaulting firms to new buyers. The recovery was 43%, implying that banks took a hair cut of 57% on their loans, he said.

If the big seven firms — Electrosteel, Bhushan Steel, Monnet Ispat, Essar Steel, Alok Industries, Bhushan Power & Steel and Jyoti Structures — were excluded then the total recovery was 10%, he said, “This means banks took hair cut of 90%.”

‘Protect MSMEs’

He wanted a clause in the law that directed the small and micro enterprises to continue supplying goods and services to the defaulter firm dropped since this would hurt the MSME sector. “You should not sacrifice the interest of the MSME sector,” the Congress member said.

Many members expressed concern over the clause on homebuyers, treating them differently from financial creditors. The law says that the homebuyer can initiate insolvency proceedings against the builder only if 10% of the applicants come together. Samajwadi Party’s Ravi Prakash, BJD’s Amar Patnaik and CPI(M)’s K.K. Raagesh raised the issue.

Minister clarifies

Speaking later, Ms. Sitharaman said the government was taking care of the interest of homebuyers and the requirement of minimum number of homebuyers in the IBC had been included to avoid “frivolous litigations.”

Top News Today


Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.