‘Role of supervisory officers missing in report on Gurugram heist’

Court directs agency to file revised report on February 18

January 19, 2022 01:34 am | Updated 01:34 am IST - GURUGRAM

The District and Sessions Court here observed that the status report filed by the Special Task Force in the multicrore theft case is silent on the role of the police officers supervising the earlier investigation. The case was initially probed by the Gurugram police.

The remarks were made by Additional Sessions Judge Jasbir Singh during the hearing of the case on Monday.

The court said the perusal of the status report filed by the investigating agency revealed that the role of officers associated with the investigation was examined, but there was “complete silence” on the role of police officers supervising the case.

Despite warning

Coming down heavily on the investigating agency, the court further said that “this is so despite the fact that this court in its previous order has deprecated the approach of investigating agency, being inert, soft and of lurking suspicion, when it comes to the examination of the roles of the police officers in covering up the multicrore heist”.

The court also pointed out that the “source of money” as well as the “purpose for which it was stored” were not traced and directed the agency to file a revised status report on February 18 with a warning that a “further failure to do so shall be viewed seriously”.

At least 10 people, including two doctors, have so far been arrested in the case pertaining to theft of ₹30 crore from the office of a private firm in Sector-84 in August last year. IPS Dheeraj Setia is accused of illegal gratification in the case in return for the cover-up. Mr. Setia, who was posted as Deputy Commissioner of Police, Crime, Gurugram at the time of heist has already been suspended.

As per the prosecution, one of the prime accused in the case, Suchender Jain Nawal, gave a bag containing 3 kg gold besides $1,35,000 to Mr. Setia to cover up the case. The police officer surrendered when the matter became public returning the kickbacks, but still kept $2,000 for the help already extended in covering up the matter.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.