Probe to continue in Bofors case, says CBI

In view of Mr. Hershman's “revelations”, the agency had earlier sought the permission of the trial court to conduct further investigation.

May 16, 2019 06:55 pm | Updated December 03, 2021 08:48 am IST - NEW DELHI

A view of the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) headquarters in New Delhi.

A view of the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) headquarters in New Delhi.

The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on Thursday said its probe in the Bofors case would continue in view of certain revelations made by one Michael Hershman.

In view of Mr. Hershman's “revelations”, the agency had earlier sought the permission of the trial court to conduct further investigation in the Bofors case.

“The Court of Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (CMM), Rouse Avenue Courts, New Delhi, had observed on May 8, 2019, that when independent right and power is available with the CBI to further investigate the matter on their own if in their wisdom it is necessary to do so then, why still such application is being filed in the court,” said the CBI.

The court had fixed the next date of hearing on May 16.

“After obtaining legal opinion, CBI filed an application on May 16 in the court of CMM, stating that for conducting further investigation under Section 173 (8) Cr.PC, permission of the court is not mandatorily required by the CBI and an intimation to the court in this regard will suffice,” the agency said.

 

The CBI had, in February 2018, moved the Supreme Court appealing to revive charges against the Hinduja brothers in the ₹64-crore Bofors guns pay-off case.

It submitted that Mr. Hershman, in an interview to an TV channel, stated that he was in possession of material which would show the payment of bribes in the Bofors deal, and that the involvement of powerful persons might be the reason for the checkered history of this case.

It said the Delhi High Court had in 2005 quashed the proceedings in an arbitrary manner saying that the evidence collected from the authorities in Sweden were “neither available in original nor duly authenticated copies”.

The agency had also blamed the UPA-I government for delay in making the appeal.

In November 2018, the Supreme Court refused to entertain the CBI plea, saying it was not convinced by the CBI's arguments.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.