Political parties in Jammu and Kashmir welcome Supreme Court’s decision to hear petitions on Article 370 daily

The apex court will commence day-to-day hearings from August 2 on the petitions challenging the abrogation of Article 370 that bestowed a special status on the erstwhile State of Jammu and Kashmir

Published - July 11, 2023 06:42 pm IST - Srinagar

National Conference (NC) leader Omar Abdullah said he is confident that there is a strong case in favour of the restoration of Article 370. File photo

National Conference (NC) leader Omar Abdullah said he is confident that there is a strong case in favour of the restoration of Article 370. File photo | Photo Credit: ANI

Political parties in Jammu and Kashmir on July 11 welcomed the Supreme Court's decision to hear a batch of petitions challenging the abrogation of Article 370 of the Constitution on a day-to-day basis.

The apex court on July 11 said it will commence day-to-day hearings from August 2 on the petitions challenging the abrogation of Article 370 that bestowed a special status on the erstwhile State of Jammu and Kashmir. National Conference (NC) leader Omar Abdullah said he was confident that there is a strong case in favour of the restoration of Article 370.

Also Read | Explained | What are the cases about Article 370 and J&K special status, up for hearing at the Supreme Court

“It took four years for the case to get to the Supreme Court. It shows how strong our case is. Had it been weak, believe me, they [the Centre] would have started the hearing within weeks. It took so long because the Constitution was blown to pieces on August 5, 2019,” the former Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister told reporters after paying homage to his grandmother Begum Akbar Jahan, the wife of NC founder Sheikh Mohammad Abdullah.

Mr. Abdullah said the abrogation of Article 370 may be linked to tourism and G20 events, but the revocation of Jammu and Kashmir’s special status was wrong. “You may package it as you may wish. Link it to tourism or G20 as much as you like, but legally and constitutionally, whatever happened with Jammu and Kashmir was wrong,” he added.

The former Union Minister also claimed that the government’s case was weak. “The government did not even try to get it listed. There are ways. If the government was interested, it could have requested the Supreme Court for an early hearing. Had its case been strong, it would have requested the chief justice for a hearing. It did not.”

Also Read | Abrogation of Article 370 led to unprecedented era of peace, prosperity in Jammu and Kashmir, Centre tells Supreme Court

“Thankfully, the Chief Justice and other Supreme Court judges came here, probably saw the situation and after going back, it was listed. Better late than never,” Mr. Abdullah said.

People’s Democratic Party (PDP) Chief Mehbooba Mufti said the top court's decision not to rely on the Centre’s affidavit on the abrogation of Article 370 vindicated her stand that the BJP-led Union government’s move did not have a logical explanation.

Ms. Mufti, however, said there were genuine apprehensions regarding why the apex court had taken up the petitions with such alacrity after remaining silent for four years.

“Hon’ble SC’s decision to not rely on GOI’s affidavit vindicates that it doesn’t have a logical explanation to justify illegal abrogation of Article 370. Having said that there are legitimate apprehensions about why SC has taken up Article 370 with such alacrity after their visit to Kashmir. After remaining silent for four years the decision to hear the case on a daily basis does evoke misgivings. Hope the Constitution of this country by which judiciary swears is not sacrificed at the altar of power to satisfy the collective conscience of people who know little about the matter," the former Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister wrote on Twitter.

NC’s chief spokesperson Tanvir Sadiq said the development instils hope among the people of Jammu and Kashmir. “It is a welcome development that the CJI will hear the petitions on a daily basis from August 2. It instils a lot of hope in the minds and hearts of the people of Jammu and Kashmir,” Mr. Sadiq told PTI here.

He said the people of Jammu and Kashmir had been waiting for this day for the last four years. “Now that the CJI has taken an interest in this case, it definitely gives us hope. We would request that the petitions are heard thoroughly and a verdict is given in our favour because we feel our case is very strong,” Mr. Sadiq said.

To a query on the top court’s observation that the Centre’s fresh affidavit will have no bearing on the hearing, the NC leader said the affidavit should not matter much as it is more about the developmental aspect.

Also Read | Centre’s view on life in J&K post-Article 370 has no bearing on constitutional challenge to abrogation: Supreme Court

“The fact that the extra affidavit of the government had more about development and the fact that the court did not agree to it is also a welcome step because you need to understand that in spite of Article 370, there was development here before 1989. In spite of Article 370, you had a record number of tourists coming to Jammu and Kashmir.”

“A record number of one crore pilgrims visited Jammu and Kashmir when Omar Abdullah was the Chief Minister. So the affidavit should not matter much, because the CJI has said the matter should be decided on the basis of the Constitution,” Mr. Sadiq said.

Senior Communist Party of India (Marxist) leader M.Y. Tarigami also welcomed the apex court's decision. “This is a positive intervention. We welcome it. Though it is late as it has taken four years, nevertheless, it has sent a positive message to the people of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh,” he said.

“We expect that justice will be delivered,” he added.

The Centre had abrogated the provisions of Article 370 on August 5, 2019, and bifurcated the erstwhile State into the Union territories of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.