PM keeps away from Shastri memorial, comes under attack

For many observers, it meant Mr. Shastri was not important enough for the BJP government.

October 03, 2015 12:18 am | Updated 12:34 pm IST - NEW DELHI:

Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi did not show up at Vijay Ghat when Lal Bahadur Shastri’s birth anniversary was being observed on Friday morning. The absence was questioned on social media and the “ModiDisrespectsShashtri” hashtag trended on Twitter. For many observers, it meant Mr. Shastri was not important enough for the BJP government.

And for Congress leaders, it was another piece of evidence to prove that the BJP was consistent in erasing the names of Congress icons from the public memory. Lal Bahadur Shastri’s grandson Vibhakar Shashtri told The Hindu that a few months after the BJP came to power in 2014, the Urban Development Ministry decided not to fund his grandfather’s birth anniversary. “For no reason whatsoever,” Vibhakar said. “The Ministry withdrew its support to this event. My grandfather gave his life for this country and he lives in the heart of every Indian. That is why Indian people have celebrated him.”

For Vibhakar, a Congress politician, the sequence — from the Ministry’s breakup with the occasion to Mr. Modi skipping it — suggests the Modi government was firm on replacing the legacy of India’s founding fathers with Hindu nationalist ideologues.

Aishwar Rao, spokesperson of the Urban Development Ministry, told The Hindu that three months after the regime at the Centre changed, his Ministry received a Cabinet Order stating that except Mahatma Gandhi’s birth anniversary, the Ministry should not fund memorials of any historic leader.

Mr. Modi did tweet a picture, though, depicting the prime minister standing before Mr. Shastri’s statue, his head down, his hands pressed together. Though the picture was backed with a text that read — “I bow to the proud son of India, Shri Lal Bahadur Shastri on his birth anniversary” — it still lacked details of when and where it was taken.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.