Pegasus case | Government cannot expect a ‘free pass’ every time spectre national security is raised in court: SC

Court’s delicacy does not licence Government to call for ‘omnibus prohibition’ against judicial review, it says

October 27, 2021 05:47 pm | Updated 05:50 pm IST - NEW DELHI

A file photo of Congress supporters protesting outside Vidhana Soudha, over Pegasus snooping issue, in Bengaluru.

A file photo of Congress supporters protesting outside Vidhana Soudha, over Pegasus snooping issue, in Bengaluru.

The State cannot keep a secret from the court merely on the bogey of ‘national security’ and expect the judiciary to remain a “mute spectator”, the Supreme Court drew the line for the Government on Wednesday.

The claim has to be backed by evidence to prove that the disclosure of the information sought by the court would affect national security concerns.

Also Read: Decoding the Pegasus verdict

A Bench led by Chief Justice N.V. Ramana was responding in its order to submissions made by Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, for the Centre, in the Pegasus snooping case . Mr. Mehta had refused the court’s repeated advice to file a detailed affidavit responding to the snooping allegations, blankly saying “the disclosure of certain facts might affect the national security and defence of the nation”.

Mr. Mehta’s reluctance had seen the Bench ask itself the question whether the Union of India could actually decline information to the Supreme Court.

Also Read: Indiscriminate spying on individuals does not suit a democracy: Supreme Court

Constitutional considerations

“Of course, the Union of India may decline to provide information when constitutional considerations exist, such as those pertaining to the security of the State. However, this does not mean that the State gets a free pass every time the spectre of ‘national security’ is raised. National security cannot be the bugbear that the judiciary shies away from, by virtue of its mere mentioning,” the court clarified.

The court accepted that judicial review in national security matters was limited. The judiciary has been circumspect while dealing with matters of national security. However, the court’s delicacy does not licence the Government to call for an “omnibus prohibition” against judicial review.

“The Union of India must necessarily plead and prove the facts which indicate that the information sought must be kept secret as their divulgence would affect national security concerns. They must justify the stand that they take before a court. The mere invocation of national security by the State does not render the court a mute spectator,” the Supreme Court emphasised.

In the Pegasus order, the court reminded the Government that the petitioners do not contend that the State should not resort to surveillance/collection of data in matters of national security.

“The complaint of the petitioners is about the misuse or likely misuse of spyware in violation of the right to privacy of citizens,” the apex court pointed out.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.