Patnaik report on ‘conspiracy against judiciary’ submitted

Former SC judge was tasked with looking into allegations by advocate

October 19, 2019 09:42 pm | Updated 09:42 pm IST - NEW DELHI

CHENNAI, 20/04/2013: Justice A.K. Patnaik, Judge, Supreme Court of India at a Meeting of the 11th All India Meet of State Legal Services Authorities held in Chennai on Saturday. 
Photo : M_Vedhan.

CHENNAI, 20/04/2013: Justice A.K. Patnaik, Judge, Supreme Court of India at a Meeting of the 11th All India Meet of State Legal Services Authorities held in Chennai on Saturday. Photo : M_Vedhan.

Former Supreme Court judge, Justice A.K. Patnaik, on Saturday confirmed to The Hindu that he has submitted a detailed 40-page report on his investigation into allegations of a “larger conspiracy” hatched by a powerful lobby of fixers, disgruntled apex court employees and corporate figures to compromise the functioning of the highest judiciary.

“The report is detailed and deals with each and every allegation made on the aspect of the larger conspiracy against the judiciary. The report was submitted in the Supreme Court a month ago. It was not taken for hearing because the court was busy with the Ayodhya issue. It will be taken up for hearing in open court shortly,” Justice Patnaik said.

The retired judge said the contents of the report cannot be over-simplified by saying that so and so has been given clean chit and others not.

“All the allegations have been squarely dealt with and conclusions drawn on them. The report is not about the woman who complained of sexual harassment against the Chief Justice of India. The report is an enquiry into the allegation of larger conspiracy and evidence produced in support of it in the Supreme Court,” Justice Patnaik said.

He said the report was not submitted by him in the Supreme Court in a sealed cover. However, he said whatever had appeared in the media about the contents of his report were “selective leaks” and not sourced from him.

Even the Special Bench of the Supreme Court led by Justice Arun Mishra, which had appointed Justice Patnaik, had clarified that the retired judge’s enquiry would not be on the woman’s sexual harassment complainant.

Justice Patnaik’s enquiry had focussed on material and affidavits provided by advocate Utsav Singh Bains, who claimed that a plot was on to target the judiciary, including Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi.

Justice Patnaik was tasked with probing into Mr. Bains’ claim that he was approached by a person called ‘Ajay’ in early April. He was offered up to ₹1.5 crore to file a false case against the CJI. This man, the lawyer had said, claimed to be a relative of the former apex court staffer who had levelled sexual harassment allegations against the Chief Justice.

The woman had abruptly withdrawn from the in-house inquiry conducted by a three-judge committee led by Justice S.A. Bobde into her sexual harassment complaint against Chief Justice Gogoi. The committee, shortly after, found no substance in her complaint.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.