Parakh did not explain reversal on Hindalco allotment decision: CBI

Updated - November 16, 2021 11:22 pm IST

Published - October 18, 2013 05:02 pm IST - New Delhi

Former Coal Secretary P.C.Parakh's name was included in the FIR after his answers were not satisfactory during his questioning, said CBI sources.

Former Coal Secretary P.C.Parakh's name was included in the FIR after his answers were not satisfactory during his questioning, said CBI sources.

Former Coal Secretary P.C. Parakh has failed to explain the reasons for allotting coal block to Hindalco after rejecting it earlier, CBI claimed on Friday amid indications that the agency will register fresh cases soon in connection with Coalgate.

The agency, which is probing the entire gamut of coal block allocation from 1993 onwards, is expected to register more cases before October 29 when it would be submitting its status report before the Supreme Court.

After registering 14 FIRs, the CBI is still probing three preliminary enquiries — for allocation of coal blocks between 1993-2004, 2006-09 and awarding of contracts for formation of joint ventures by government companies under the ’Government Dispensation Category’ from 1993 onwards.

Highly placed sources in the agency said that Mr. Parakh was examined before registering a case against Hindalco during which he was asked about the reasons for reversing the decision to reject the company’s application.

The sources claimed that Mr. Parakh could not explain under what circumstances he changed his own “considered” view and allowed Hindalco to get a pie in Talabira II and III coal blocks in Odisha which were allocated to PSUs — Mahanadi Coalfields and Neyveli Lignite and hence his name was included in the FIR.

Mr. Parakh has held that there was nothing wrong with the decision as Hindalco was the first applicant and equally competent to get the coal block.

The former bureaucrat, who has been praised by the CAG as whistleblower, had, however, contended that “... if there is a conspiracy, then there are different members in this conspiracy. There is K M Birla who made the representation, he is one conspirator. I, who examined the case and made a recommendation, I can be another conspirator and the Prime Minister, who as the Coal Minister, took the final decision is the third conspirator.”

CBI has alleged in its FIR that after rejection of Hindalco’s plea in 2005, Birla wrote two letters and held a personal meeting with Parakh, after which the decision was reversed.

They said FIR has named Mr. Parakh and Aditya Birla group chairman Kumar Mangalam Birla because it was a case of alleged misuse of official position.

The sources said if no malafide is found during the probe, the case would be closed and Supreme Court would be informed about it.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in


Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.