Vigilance sleuths search suspended IPS officer’s house

October 14, 2015 12:00 am | Updated 08:00 am IST - Lucknow:

Suspended IPS officer Amitabh Thakur argues with the vigilance team that conducted searches in his house in Lucknow on Tuesday.Photo Rajeev Bhatt

Suspended IPS officer Amitabh Thakur argues with the vigilance team that conducted searches in his house in Lucknow on Tuesday.Photo Rajeev Bhatt

High drama was witnessed on Monday when Vigilance Department sleuths searched the house of suspended IG-rank officer Amitabh Thakur, who is locked in a tussle with SP chief Mulayam Singh, in a disproportionate assets case.

A member of the Vigilance Department team was seen darting out of the residence with a sheaf of papers in his hands and being confronted by an angry Mr. Thakur, a senior IPS officer.

Mr. Thakur wanted his documents to be returned but the vigilance sleuth refused to do so.

“The vigilance team is conducting a raid at my residence as Director Vigilance Bhanu Pratap Singh is working as a SP man. I am being harassed as I have lodged FIR against Mulayam Singh Yadav,” Mr. Thakur told reporters outside his Gomti Nagar house.

Mr. Thakur last week gave a complaint at the Vibhuti Khand police station seeking registration of an FIR against the Vigilance Director and others for alleged misrepresentation of facts in their inquiry report against him.

The Vigilance Department had lodged an FIR against him last month charging him with possessing assets disproportionate to his known sources of income. He was suspended in July after he lodged a police complaint against Mr Singh, accusing him of threatening him over phone and attached to the Director-General of Police (DGP) headquarters.

Mr. Thakur alleged that Vigilance Department chief and his subordinates have prepared a list of properties owned by his parents, brother, wife and an organisation with which he was earlier attached to, and showed them as his assets.

He said neither he nor his relatives were given a chance to explain about the acquisition of those properties.

Mr. Thakur maintained that it is a rule in any open inquiry, before declaring any property benami, the Vigilance Department should give the owners and suspected beneficiary a chance to explain. He claimed this was not done in order to implicate him in a hurried manner.

When the vigilance team emerged out of Mr. Thakur’s house, waiting media persons asked it about the findings of the search, but the officials refused to divulge any details.

As media persons and onlookers gathered outside his house, Mr. Thakur said the sleuths had refused to show their identity cards when he asked for the same and behaved like party workers.-PTI

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.