Sushant Singh Rajput death case | Co-accused Zaid Vilantra files for bail

He was sent to judicial custody on September 9 along with Rhea Chakraborty and her brother Showik

September 12, 2020 06:28 pm | Updated September 13, 2020 12:14 am IST - Mumbai:

A view of the Bombay High Court.

A view of the Bombay High Court.

An alleged drug peddler and co-accused along with actor Rhea Chakraborty,  Zaid Vilatra , arrested by the Narcotics Control Bureau (NCB), filed for bail before the Bombay High Court on Saturday

Also read: Sushant Singh Rajput death | Narcotics Control Bureau questions Rhea Chakraborty for six hours

A resident of Bandra, Mr. Vilantra, 20, moved the High Court after the special Narcotics Drug Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act court rejected his bail on September 11. He has challenged the lower court order, seeks to quash it, and urges to be released on bail. On September 9, he was sent to judicial custody by the magistrate court along with Ms. Chakraborty and her brother Showik.

On September 1, the NCB searched Mr. Vilantra’s premises and ₹9,55,750; $2,081; 180 U.K. pounds; and 15 UAE dirhams were recovered. His statement was recorded by the agency, where he said that the seized amount was sales proceeds from contraband and that he had supplied marijuana to many persons. He also disclosed a few names with details, and gave the name of one Abel Parihar as one of the receivers of marijuana.

The petition states that he retracted the alleged confession before a magistrate the next day and that “there was absolutely no recovery of any contraband at his instance”, and there was “absolutely no nexus between him and any contraband of commercial quantity”. The plea questions the applicability of Section 27A (consumption of narcotic drug or psychotropic substance) of the NDPS Act.

Also read | Mumbai court denies bail to Rhea Chakraborty, others in drugs case

He was arrested on September 2 and has been charged under Section 8(c) (prohibition to produce, manufacture, possess, sell, purchase, transport); 20(b) (ii) (A) (whoever produces, possesses, sells, transports or uses cannabis); 23 (punishment for illegal import into India, export from India or transhipment of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances); 27-A (financing illicit traffic and harbouring offenders); 29 (punishment for abetment and criminal conspiracy); and 30, of the NDPS.

The plea reads: “There is absolutely no nexus between the applicant [Vilatra] and any contraband of commercial quantity. Under no circumstance can section 27A which stipulates a strict 10 -20 year sentence and fine of ₹1 lakh to ₹2 lakh, be attracted. Thus the section cannot not be applicable to offences involving small quantity or non-commercial quantity.”

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.