SC restrains media in Bihar shelter home case

Over 30 girls were allegedly raped at the centre run by one Brajesh Thakur, the chief of the state-funded NGO.

August 02, 2018 05:01 pm | Updated 10:48 pm IST - New Delhi

Members of a social organisation protest against the Muzaffarpur shelter home case at Bihar Bhawan, in New Delhi on July 30, 2018.

Members of a social organisation protest against the Muzaffarpur shelter home case at Bihar Bhawan, in New Delhi on July 30, 2018.

The Supreme Court on Thursday placed a blanket ban on the media showing images, even in a morphed form, of the victims of rape at a shelter home in Bihar’s Muzaffarpur district.

Taking cognisance of the sexual abuse at the shelter home run by a State-funded NGO, a Bench of Justices Madan B. Lokur and Deepak Gupta directed the media not to interview the victims.

The Bench took up the case after Ranvijay Kumar from Patna wrote to the court about repeated media interviews with the victims.

The Bench remarked that courts have repeatedly said a victim of sexual offence should not be made to relive the trauma. In this case, the victims were made to go through it again and again, the Bench said.

Calling it “extremely disturbing,” the Bench issued notice to the Centre and the Bihar government seeking their responses.

“Why should a child be interviewed at all? Will the interviewer or the person holding the camera appear in the witness box? Never,” the bench remarked.

Advocate Aparna Bhat, who was appointed amicus curiae in the matter, requested the court to give a direction that there should not be any media interview with the alleged victims.

“What about freedom of speech and expression? Media will then say that the Supreme Court is banning them,” the bench said.

Additional Solicitor General (ASG) Tushar Mehta, appearing for the Centre, said a minor must be insulated from such interviews.

The bench said it had not restrained the police from conducting a probe. If they wanted to question the alleged victims, they would have to take the assistance of professional counsellors and qualified child psychiatrist, in consultation with the National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro-Sciences in Bengaluru and the Tata Institute of Social Sciences (TISS) in Mumbai.

The bench wanted to know whether the victims had been given compensation. It posted the case for further hearing on August 7.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.