Rajasthan political crisis | Speaker moves Supreme Court again

Plea says High Court’s order on status quo is ‘ex facie unconstitutional’

July 29, 2020 10:02 pm | Updated July 30, 2020 01:34 am IST - NEW DELHI

Tight spot: Ashok Gehlot and other Congress leaders arriving at the party office in Jaipur on Wednesday.

Tight spot: Ashok Gehlot and other Congress leaders arriving at the party office in Jaipur on Wednesday.

Rajasthan Assembly Speaker, C.P. Joshi, on Wednesday moved the Supreme Court against the State High Court’s July 24 order effectively deferring his disqualification action against ousted deputy Chief Minister Sachin Pilot and 18 other dissident Congress legislators.

Mr. Joshi, represented by advocate Sunil Fernandes, said the “status quo” order of the High Court crossed the “Lakshman Rekha” between the domains of the judiciary and the legislature.

“Judiciary was never expected under the Tenth Schedule to interfere in the manner it has done in the instant case resulting in encroachment by the High Court in the field exclusively reserved for the Speaker. The status quo order interdicts the Speaker from proceeding to even adjudicate the disqualification petitions pending before him under the Tenth Schedule of the Constitution,” the special leave petition said.

Mr. Joshi said the Court, as the “sentinel on the qui vive”, should restore the Principle of Separation of Governance. He said the July 24 order of the High Court was “ exfacie unconstitutional and in the teeth of the law” declared in Kihoto Hollohan v. Zachillhu 1992 judgment of the Supreme Court, which held that judicial review is impermissible until the Speaker gives a final decision in disqualification proceedings under the Tenth Schedule.

“The order restraining the Speaker from performing his constitutional duties under the Tenth Schedule is a direct intrusion by the High Court into the domain exclusively reserved for the Speaker ... The impugned order of the High Court is a direct interference in the ‘proceedings of the House’ under Para 6(2) of the Tenth Schedule which is prohibited under Article 212 of the Constitution,” the petition said.

The Speaker’s office had on Monday withdrawn an earlier petition challenging an order of the High Court on July 21, requesting him to defer the disqualification proceedings.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.