JD(U) leaders frown upon Prashant Kishor’s remarks

In a television interview, Prashant Kishor had said Nitish Kumar should have sought fresh mandate after he aligned with the NDA.

March 09, 2019 10:14 am | Updated 10:14 am IST - Patna

In September 2018 when election strategist Prashant Kishor had officially joined Janata Dal (United), party president and Bihar Chief Minister Nitish Kumar had said, “he is the future” but, Mr Kishor’s recent remarks has landed him in a soup with his position in the JD(U) in a jeopardy.

During an interview in private news channel, Mr. Kishor had said, “He (Nitish Kumar) should have gone for a fresh mandate after he changed sides from mahagathbandhan to NDA.” And, this remark has apparently triggered serious discontent within the party.

“People who looked at Nitish Kumar as challenger to PM Narendra Modi would find the decision wrong but people who used to think he was compromising on governance only for the sake of defeating PM Modi would have found the decision correct… it depends on which side of the part you sit”, Mr. Kishor had said in the interview while, adding, “I think when he (Nitish Kumar) changed sides he should have ideally sought fresh mandate.”

Earlier, while addressing students in Muzaffarpur, Mr. Kishor had reportedly told them that when he could help people become Prime Ministers and Chief Ministers, he could “definitely make students become MLAs, MPs and district board presidents.”

Mr Kishor’s remarks have caused serious resentment among party leaders.

“He (Prashant Kishor) is offering pravachan (discourse) on seeking a mandate. Where was his gyan (knowledge) when the party took the decision to realign with the BJP? Moreover, does he not remember that his own formal entry into the JD(U) came after the development, which he questioning now?” asked JD(U) MLC and party spokesman Neeraj Kumar.

JD(U) general secretary and Rajya Sabha member RCP Singh, who has also been a close confidante of Mr. Nitish Kumar said, “When we walked out of the mahagathbandhan (Grand Alliance), he (Mr. Kishor) was not even in the party… it could have been his opinion but the decision to come out of the mahagathbandhan was taken unanimously by the party after the State and national executive consent.”

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.