Mukesh Ambani home bomb scare | Court denies pre-arrest bail for police officer Sachin Vaze

Deceased auto parts dealer was linked to car found with threatening letter next to Mukesh Ambani’s residence

March 13, 2021 01:05 pm | Updated March 14, 2021 12:53 am IST - Mumbai:

A Sessions court at Thane rejected Assistant Police Inspector Sachin Vaze’s plea for pre-arrest bail  in connection with the death of Mansukh Hiran, an auto parts dealer linked to the car found next to Mukesh Ambani’s residence. A threatening letter  was found in the car.

Additional Sessions Judge Shailendra Tambe passed the order on March 12 and held, “The accused is unknown hence, there is criminal conspiracy and thorough investigation is necessary by Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS). Hence, this court is not agreed to grant interim bail to the applicant (Mr. Vaze) because there is prima facie evidence and material against the applicant. The say of ATS is necessary. The custodial interrogation of the applicant is necessary.”

Mr. Vaze sought interim bail under Section 438 (direction for grant of bail to person apprehending arrest) of the Code of Criminal Procedure through advocate Aarti Kalekar.

Ms. Kalekar had argued that Mr. Vaze had been extensively interrogated for eight hours on March 8 by senior officers, including the Deputy Commissioner of Police. She mentioned the Khwaja Yunus custodial death in 2004 and said he (Yunus) suffered from 17 years of undue suspension in a false case and was granted bail after 58 days of being in custody.

The court recorded, “On February 27 and 28, Hiren was along with Mr. Vaze. Hiren’s body was found and after prima facie investigation, offence was registered against the unknown person. But in the statement of the informant (Hiren’s wife) who is knowing all the facts which was stated in FIR, she informed the police that Mr Waze and her husband were in regular contact. She has informed the police about all the facts and directly made allegations against Mr Waze with name.”

The order read, “Hence, this court has come to the conclusion that investigation is at initial stage by ATS. The offence is under section 201 of Indian Penal Code causing disappearance of evidence i.e. death body of Mansukh Hiren and section 120B criminal conspiracy. The offence under section 302 is a serious offence.”

The hearing is adjourned to March 19.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.