Coronavirus | Bombay High Court asks Maharashtra if redressal system exists for COVID-19 patients

The Court asked the State if it could take any action against private institutions that overcharged COVID-19 patients.

October 01, 2020 06:30 pm | Updated 10:07 pm IST - Mumbai

The Bench sid that cancelling registrations might prove counterproductive since the State was already facing a dearth of COVID-19 treatment facilities. File Photo.

The Bench sid that cancelling registrations might prove counterproductive since the State was already facing a dearth of COVID-19 treatment facilities. File Photo.

The Bombay High Court asked the Maharashtra government on Thursday if there existed a grievance redressal mechanism in the State for citizens to complain if they are overcharged for COVID-19 treatment at private hospitals and nursing homes.

A bench of Chief Justice Dipankar Datta and Justice Girish Kulkarni was hearing a public interest litigation seeking that the State fix a maximum rate that private hospitals and nursing homes can charge for PPE kits.

In the previous hearing, the State had told the court that while it had fixed a charge limit for beds and ancillary items including PPE kits for 80% of beds, private hospitals and nursing homes were permitted to charge their own rates for the remaining 20% for treatment of both COVID and non COVID patients.

The State government had said at the time that it could not take over private hospitals completely.

On Thursday, however, petitioner Abhijeet Mangade urged the court to direct the State to fix the maximum limit for charges for PPE kits for the remaining beds as well.

The court then asked the State if it could take any action against private institutions that overcharged COVID-19 patients.

“Even if these are private hospitals, the State grants them registration. If needed, you can cancel their registration, then why can’t action be taken if they overcharge?” the bench said.

It however, added that cancelling registrations might prove counterproductive since the State was already facing a dearth of COVID-19 treatment facilities.

“In the state where I come from (West Bengal), there were similar complaints prior to COVID-19 of hospitals overcharging patients,” CJ Datta said.

“Thereafter, a statutory commission headed by a retired high court judge and some doctors was constituted. It is performing quite well,” he said.

The court suggested that the State think about a similar grievance redressal mechanism, or if a mechanism already existed, then to ensure its implementation, it said.

The court disposed of the PIL and thanked Mr. Mangade for “bringing such an important issue before the court”.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.