Gyanvapi-Shringar Gauri issue | Suit on Hindu worshippers’ rights maintainable: HC

The suit filed in August 2021 sought permission for daily worship at Maa Shringar Gauri Sthal.

May 31, 2023 07:19 pm | Updated 09:35 pm IST - Prayagraj

The Gyanvapi mosque. File

The Gyanvapi mosque. File | Photo Credit: PTI

The Allahabad High Court on May 31 dismissed the plea moved by the Anjuman Intazamia Mosque Committee, which manages the Gyanvapi mosque in Varanasi, challenging the maintainability of a suit filed by women worshippers in the district court, seeking the right to worship Hindu deities inside the mosque premises. Thus, the High Court upheld the Varanasi court’s order, holding the suit to be maintainable.

The High Court Bench of Justice J.J. Munir announced the order, which has been reserved since last December. The detailed order in the matter is still awaited.

Right to worship

In August 2021, Rakshi Singh and four other Hindu women moved the Varanasi civil court, seeking the right to worship Hindu deities within the Gyanvapi mosque premises all through the year. In their claim, the plaintiffs had said that the Gyanvyapi mosque and its premises was once a Hindu temple. They claimed that Mughal ruler Aurangzeb had demolished the temple and built the mosque above it.

Also read:Explained | The Gyanvapi Mosque-Kashi Vishwanath dispute and the current case

The maintainability of their suit was challenged in April 2022 by the Anjuman Committee, which filed an application under Order 7 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure arguing that the Hindu worshippers’ suit was barred by law, referring to the Places of Worship Act, 1991.

‘Hindu worship continued after 1947’

After a Supreme Court order, the matter was transferred to the Varanasi district court, which dismissed the mosque committee’s plea in September 2022. District judge A.K. Vishvesha had ruled that neither the Places of Worship Act, 1991, nor the Waqf Act, 1995, nor the U.P. Shri Kashi Vishwanath Temple Act, 1983 prevented the suit from being heard. He said that the “plaintiffs will have right to prove their averments by cogent evidence”.

Rejecting the objection to the suit, the Varanasi court had specifically held that since the Hindu worshippers claim that the Hindu deities were being worshipped by them inside the masjid complex even after August 15, 1947 — which is the cut-off date provided under the Places of Worship Act — the 1991 act would not be applicable in this case.

The mosque committee had then appealed the district court’s order in the High Court in October 2022.

Top News Today

Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in


Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.