ADVERTISEMENT

Court junks NCB’s application in Aryan Khan case

October 25, 2021 06:56 pm | Updated 08:07 pm IST - Mumbai

Plea urges court not to take cognizance of affidavit by witness

Prabhakar Sail, an independent witness in the cruise drugs case, has claimed that ₹25 crore was demanded by an NCB official and other persons, including absconding witness K.P. Gosavi, to let off Aryan Khan in the case.

A special court on Monday junked a plea of the Narcotics Control Bureau (NCB) urging it to not take cognizance of an affidavit filed by an alleged witness during the drug raid carried out on a cruise on October 1, after which actor Shah Rukh Khan’s son Aryan Khan was arrested.

The court said, “no blanket orders can be passed and disposed of the application filed by Sameer Wankhede, Zonal Director of NCB before the special court assigned under the Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act against the affidavit filed by Prabhakar Sail”.

ADVERTISEMENT

Explained | What is ‘conscious possession’ of drugs?

ADVERTISEMENT

The NCB sought directions that no action or cognizance be taken on Mr. Sail’s notarised affidavit. Mr. Wankhede says that the only justification seems to be the arrest of the leader’s (Cabinet Minister Nawab Malik’s) son–in-law in an NDPS case and his subsequent release on bail.

On October 24, Mr. Sail, in statement to the media, alleged that ₹ 25 crore was demanded by an NCB official, including absconding witness K.P. Gosavi, to let go Mr. Khan in the case. He told the media that he overheard Mr. Gosavi telling one Sam D’Souza over the phone, after Mr. Khan was brought to the NCB office following the October 2 raid, about a demand of ₹ 25 crore and to settle at ₹18 crore as they have to give ₹ 8 crore to Mr. Wankhede. Mr. Salil had said he would soon release evidence to support his claim.

ADVERTISEMENT

Also read: Bombay High Court to hear Aryan Khan's bail plea on October 26

ADVERTISEMENT

On October 24, Mr. Wankhede wrote to Mumbai Police Commissioner Hemant Nagrale, seeking protection from likely legal action being planned against him by unknown persons to falsely frame him concerning an alleged vigilance related issue.

This is a Premium article available exclusively to our subscribers. To read 250+ such premium articles every month
You have exhausted your free article limit.
Please support quality journalism.
You have exhausted your free article limit.
Please support quality journalism.
The Hindu operates by its editorial values to provide you quality journalism.
This is your last free article.

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT