Chinmayanand granted bail in Shahjahanpur case

Allahabad HC directs court to take up case on priority basis

February 03, 2020 11:13 pm | Updated 11:13 pm IST - LUCKNOW

**EDS: AUG. 17, 2010 FILE PHOTO** New Delhi: Former party  MP Chinmayanand Swami (L) with then BJP MP Yogi Adityanath, outside Parliament in New Delhi, Aug. 17, 2010. The Supreme Court has directed Uttar Pradesh government Monday to set up SIT headed by IG-rank officer to look into the allegations of alleged sexual harassment by a Shahjahanpur law student. (PTI Photo/Subhav Shukla)(PTI9_2_2019_000096B)

**EDS: AUG. 17, 2010 FILE PHOTO** New Delhi: Former party MP Chinmayanand Swami (L) with then BJP MP Yogi Adityanath, outside Parliament in New Delhi, Aug. 17, 2010. The Supreme Court has directed Uttar Pradesh government Monday to set up SIT headed by IG-rank officer to look into the allegations of alleged sexual harassment by a Shahjahanpur law student. (PTI Photo/Subhav Shukla)(PTI9_2_2019_000096B)

Former BJP Minister Swami Chinmayanand was granted bail by the Allahabad High Court in the alleged sexual exploitation case of a law student studying in his college in Shahjahanpur district of Uttar Pradesh.

Mr. Chinmayanand is accused of misusing his authority to seduce or induce the law student to have sexual intercourse with him, among other offences.

The law student who made the allegations against him was granted bail in December in connection with the extortion case against her by Mr. Chinmayanand. A Bench of Justice Rahul Chaturvedi granted bail to Mr. Chinmayanand on a personal bond and on furnishing “two heavy sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned”.

The court also directed that the trial of both the cases — sexual exploitation and extortion — be transferred from Shahjahanpur to a court in Lucknow.

“...the court concerned at Lucknow is directed to take both the cases on priority basis, if possible on day to day basis,” the court observed.

“The police chief of Lucknow is also directed to ensure the security and safety of the law student, her family members and witnesses during the entire trial period by deputing an officer to the rank of Senior Sub Inspector and armed constables,” the court said.

Commenting on the case, the court said, “At this stage it is very difficult to adjudicate as to who exploited whom? In fact, both of them used each other."

“... at this juncture, this court draws its conclusion that it was a complete matter of quid pro quo but over a span of time the greed for extracting “more”, she along with her accomplices seems to have advanced for hatching a conspiracy against the applicant [Mr. Chinmayanand] and tried to blackmail him for ransom, through the obscenic (sic) video clips recorded by herself,” the court order read.

‘Blurred changes’

The court also said that since the chargesheet in the case was already filed and the “magistrate has already taken cognizance of the offences” it had “blurred chances” of any tampering of evidence at this stage.

While granting bail to Mr. Chinmayanand, the court also observed that the law student was already granted bail so “there is no justifiable reason to deny the bail to the present applicant — Chinmayanand”.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.