Bombay High Court quashes order refusing to restrain Nawab Malik from commenting on Sameer Wankhede

Interim application will be heard in the defamation suit

November 29, 2021 02:08 pm | Updated 10:37 pm IST - Mumbai:

Maharashtra Minister and NCP leader Nawab Malik. File

Maharashtra Minister and NCP leader Nawab Malik. File

The Bombay High Court on Monday quashed and set aside the order refusing to restrain Maharashtra Cabinet Minister Nawab Malik from making defamatory statements against Sameer Wankhede, Narcotics Control Bureau’s zonal director and his family.

A division bench of justices SJ Kathawalla and Milind Jadhav recalled the order passed by Justice Madhav Jamdar. This was done after Sameer Wankhede’s father Dhyandev and Mr. Malik consented that the order be recalled. Both the parties agreed that Mr. Wankhede’s grievances against the minister be heard afresh in an interim application filed by him.

Senior advocate Birendra Saraf appearing for Mr. Wankhede told the bench that the Court may record that both parties are consenting to quash the order passed on November 22. The Court allowed Mr. Malik to file a fresh affidavit in the interim application in the defamatory suit filed by Mr. Wankhede by December 9. Mr. Wankhede will then file a rejoinder by January 3 and the matter will be heard by the same bench of justice Madhav Jamdar and completed in 13 weeks, the Court directed.

Meanwhile, the Court directed that Mr. Malik will not make any public statements or use social media against the Wankhedes. Last week, the bench had said Mr. Malik’s tweets against Mr. Wankhede did seem to be a clear case of malice and logically he should be restrained from making such comments.

The order which has been quashed read, “Right to privacy is implicit in the right to life and liberty. Public has the right to comment on the life of a public officer, but that has to be done with reasonable verification. These are only prima facie observations. The defendant (Mr. Malik) has raised pertinent issues against the plaintiff (Mr. Wankhede). It cannot be said that the allegation pertaining to name cannot be false. It cannot be said that the defendant has acted with reasonable malice.”

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.