BJP chides Chintaman Wanaga family for meeting Shiv Sena chief

May 05, 2018 01:01 am | Updated 01:01 am IST

Mumbai: A day after family members of late BJP MP Chintaman Wanaga from Palghar Lok Sabha constituency held a meeting with Shiv Sena chief Uddhav Thackeray, the BJP retorted that for 35 years the party had extended complete faith in Wanaga and the family should not hurriedly take any decision.

“One must understand that the Wanaga had been with the BJP for more than 35 years and helped to build the party from scratch. The Wanaga family held on to various posts in these years. If the family has any complaints, then I am sure that our state leadership will address it,” said Revenue Minister Chandrakant Patil. “We all belong to an organisation or a party. We should take into consideration what the organisation wants us to do,” he said adding that the BJP is yet to decide on the candidate’s name for Palghar and Bhandara-Gondia by-poll.

On Thursday night, the family of late BJP MP, his wife and two sons, had held a meeting with Shiv Sena chief Uddhav Thackeray with reports that three will join the Sena as the state BJP leadership ignored them. Mr. Thackeray had said that he would welcome them in the party. “We are hopeful that both Sena and BJP will contest the polls together. We might fight in open, but during elections we will surely keep the differences aside,” said Mr. Patil.

In another development connected to the Council polls, the Aurangabad bench of Bombay High Court barred six BJP voters from voting in Latur-Beed-Osmanabad. This could be a blow to the Women and Child Welfare Minister Pankaja Munde.

Despite having won the Beed Zilla Parishad polls on NCP symbol, six members chose to vote for the BJP while choosing ZP president. After complaint from the NCP, the collector barred them from voting which was lifted by Ms Munde. The NCP had approached the court against Ms. Munde’s order.

Talking to The Hindu , Advocate S.V. Kanitkar said, “Justice P R Bora set aside the order from the minister and said that it was ‘arbitrary, bad in law and does not follow principles of natural justice’. The lawyer appearing for Ms. Munde sough a stay on the order. A conditional stay was granted by the court which means the member can continue but cannot vote in the council polls.”

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.