Bhima-Koregaon: HC grants relief to Navlakha, Teltumbde

Rejects Father Stan Swamy’s petition to quash FIR filed by Pune police

December 15, 2018 01:31 am | Updated 10:07 am IST

Gautam Navlakha

Gautam Navlakha

Mumbai: The Bombay High Court on Friday extended protection from arrest of activists Gautam Navlakha till January 14, 2019, and Anand Teltumbde till December 17, but rejected Father Stan Swamy’s plea to quash the FIR against him in the Bhima-Koregaon case.

A Division Bench of Justices B.P. Dharmadhikari and S.V. Kotwal was hearing a bunch of petitions filed by Mr. Navlakha, Mr. Teltumbde, and Mr. Swamy seeking quashing of the FIR and all criminal proceedings filed against them by the Pune police.

Advocate Yug Chaudhary, appearing for Mr. Navlakha, told the court that the Delhi High Court had quashed the arrest, but the Maharashtra government filed a special leave petition in the Supreme Court (SC) against it, but another Bench at the Bombay HC stayed the arrest. Therefore, the arrest remains quashed as of now, and the next hearing in the SC is on January 10, 2019.

However, additional government pleader Aruna Kamat Pai said she wants the stay to be vacated as the investigation is still on. The HC said since the SC will hear the matter on January 10, it will hear it on January 14, and extended the interim relief till then.

Then, senior counsel Mihir Desai, representing Mr. Swamy and Mr. Teltumbde, started arguing for Mr. Swamy. Mr. Desai said he is a 83-year-old priest who is not an accused but a ‘suspect’, so the FIR against him should be quashed.

The court asked how can a suspect come to court for protection and not apply for anticipatory bail? Mr. Desai said sections of the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act (UAPA) have been applied on him. “If the police make him an accused he will be arrested and he needs protection.”

Ms. Pai said investigation is on and he is only a suspect, therefore no protection can be granted to him. The court said it cannot quash the FIR and if the investigating agency comes across any material which shows an offence under the UAPA, he will be arrested.

The Bench said, “We cannot find any fault with the style of authorities and the statement that he is a suspect, is not grave.” The court refused to intervene and rejected the petition.

Arguing for Mr. Teltumbde, Mr. Desai said, he only wrote an article about the Bhima-Koregaon violence and the police did not conduct a raid in his house. The court adjourned the matter till December 17, and granted interim relief till then.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.