Fresh probe ordered into post-Godhra riot case

July 22, 2010 02:04 am | Updated 02:04 am IST - AHMEDABAD

The Gujarat High Court has ordered a fresh probe into one of the post-Godhra riot cases, eight years after the incident.

Justice Akil Kureshi has asked the Superintendent of Police, Ahmedabad Rural, to open a new inquiry into the February 28, 2002 rioting at Viramgam, in which three members of the minority community were killed and eight injured. The probe has to be completed in three months.

The court passed the order on a petition filed by Doshmohammad Bhatti, who claimed that the police had recorded the statement of only one eyewitness though there were more eyewitnesses to the attack.

The police had investigated the case and filed a charge sheet against 10 persons. The trial began in the Viramgam Sessions Court in 2006. But Bhatti, claimed to be an eyewitness himself, filed an application in the court in January this year, demanding further investigation. After the Sessions Court rejected it, he moved the High Court.

“The assertions of the petitioner that there were other eyewitnesses need a closer examination. If there were other persons, as it is likely, whose testimony may throw some light on the manner in which the incident took place, such an angle should be probed further,” Justice Kureshi said.

Advocate-General pulled up

In another development, the High Court has pulled up Advocate-General Kamal Trivedi for the State government's failure to file an affidavit explaining its stand on the demand for a CBI investigation into the alleged fake encounter killing of Ishrat Jahan.

Though Mr. Trivedi had submitted before a Division Bench of Justices Jayant Patel and Abhilasha Kumari that the government was opposed to handing over the probe to the Central Bureau of Investigation, he was told to file an affidavit. But the government failed to do so within the stipulated period. Now it has promised to file an affidavit in a day or two.

The court has also wanted to know from the government whether it would agree to the reconstitution of the Special Investigation Team by taking in some officials of the Central investigating agencies.

The demand for a CBI inquiry was made separately by Shamima Kausar, mother of Ishrat Jahan, and Gopinath Pillai, father of Pranesh Pillai alias Javed Sheikh, who was also among those killed with Ishrat. The petitioners claimed that they did not expect the investigation by the Gujarat police to be impartial.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.