Now, questions about an idol Down Under

National Gallery, Canberra yet to reveal provenance details of the idol

August 04, 2012 11:27 pm | Updated December 03, 2021 10:40 am IST - CHENNAI

11th Century Chola Natraja sculpture acquired by National Gallery of Australia from Subhash Kapoor in 2008. Photo Courtesy National Gallery of Australia

11th Century Chola Natraja sculpture acquired by National Gallery of Australia from Subhash Kapoor in 2008. Photo Courtesy National Gallery of Australia

The trail of the stolen idols has reached Australia. The National Gallery of Australia in Canberra has admitted to The Hindu that it bought an 11th century Chola period Nataraja bronze idol in 2008 from Subhash Kapoor, the U.S.-based antiques dealer arrested in July for his alleged role in idol thefts.

In reply to queries, the Gallery in a release said it purchased the idol from Kapoor “following a thorough due diligence process.”

It contacted the Indian High Commission in Canberra “earlier this week to ensure a fully co-operative approach.” It had not been contacted by Indian authorities. Significantly, an image of the sculpture was removed from the National Gallery website on August 3, subsequent to the queries.

The Gallery did not reply to queries on the provenance details from its acquisition records. Provenance certificate is a record of ownership. Museums are expected to check the provenance of an artefact before acquiring it. The Gallery said in its release it was re-examining the documents supplied by Kapoor.

The New York Post first reported that a Nataraja idol sold by Kapoor, valued at $2 million, was on display at the National Gallery.

Ron Radford, Director of the Gallery, insisted: “It is yet to be determined if this work is one of the stolen works as has been speculated about in certain media outlets. The Gallery has not received any advice from Indian authorities to this effect.”

A scrutiny of the Nataraja image from the Sripuranthan temple in Tamil Nadu, recorded by the French Institute Pondicherry, and the image as it appears in the National Gallery of Australia Annual Report (2007-08) reveals a close resemblance.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.