Nobody should be condemned unheard, says former Lokayukta

“Justice Ganguly should not retire on the basis of allegations”

December 26, 2013 01:22 am | Updated November 16, 2021 07:51 pm IST - KOLKATA:

Opposing the clamour for resignation of Justice (retired) Asok Kumar Ganguly from the post of chairperson of the West Bengal Human Rights Commission in the wake of allegations of sexual harassment by a woman law intern, State’s former Lokayukta Samaresh Banerjee said on Wednesday that the retired judge should not resign.

“I do no think that Justice Ganguly should resign just on the basis of allegations,” Justice Banerjee, himself a retired High Court judge told The Hindu .

Referring to former Attorney General Soli Sorabjee’s views that Justice Ganguly’s resignation would set dangerous a precedent, Justice Banerjee said: “Nobody can be condemned unheard.”

“An integral part of the Rule of Law which we keep taking about is nobody should be condemned unheard. In this case, it seems that it is already decided that Justice Ganguly is guilty,” he said.

Expressing his surprise that a section of politicians were raising the demand for Justice Ganguly’s resignation, Justice Banerjee said he wanted to ask whether the politicians would apply the same yardstick to themselves if allegations were levelled against them.

“Throughout my life I worked honestly and after that if somebody levels allegation against me then can I be held guilty,” he quipped.

Justice Banerjee said the “prescribed procedure” of law should be followed when allegations were being made.

His remarks come at a time when Justice Ganguly has written to the Chief Justice of India raising questions on the apex court panel that prime facie held that allegations against him disclose an act of unwelcome behaviour.

While Justice Ganguly had said there had been concerted efforts to malign his image, the law intern had taken exception to the political conspiracy charge and said she would decide on pursuing appropriate criminal proceedings against Justice Ganguly at an appropriate time.

Justice Ganguly has however maintained his silence since writing the letter to the CJI on December 23.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.