SC clears the decks for NEET results

It requests High Courts not to entertain petitions on matters relating to 2017 NEET.

June 12, 2017 11:34 am | Updated 09:50 pm IST - New Delhi

Students come out after appearing for NEET 2017 at a centre in Madurai.

Students come out after appearing for NEET 2017 at a centre in Madurai.

The Supreme Court on Monday asked the Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE) to declare the results of the National Eligibility-cum-Entrance Test (NEET) for admission to MBBS and BDS by putting a stay on a Madras High Court order restraining the publication of the results.

The apex court order comes as a relief to 12 lakh medical aspirants who had written the examination.

The apex court directed the authorities concerned to proceed with the process of the declaration of results, subsequent counselling and admission as per the schedule fixed by it earlier.

However, a vacation bench of Justices P.C. Pant and Deepak Gupta said the declaration of results as well as the subsequent counselling and admission will be subject to the decision of the court in the matter pending before it. It requested all the High Courts not to entertain petitions in the matters relating to the NEET.

The order came on a plea by the CBSE and others challenging the May 24 order of the Madras High Court.

Additional Solicitor General (ASG) Maninder Singh, appearing for the CBSE, told the Bench that the High Court order was in conflict with the schedule fixed by the apex court earlier.

The Bench observed that the High Court order was “indirectly diluting the schedule” fixed by the apex court. “On one ground we are inclined to stay the High Court order. What indirectly this order is doing is that it is diluting the schedule fixed by the Supreme Court,” it said.

“In view of the above, the interim order is stayed and it is directed that the authorities concerned will proceed further with the declaration of results for the NEET 2017 examination subject to decision of this court,” the Bench said while listing the matter for further proceedings after summer vacation.

On June 9, the CBSE moved the Supreme Court seeking an immediate stay on the Madras High Court order.

On May 24, the Hiigh Court granted an interim stay on the publication of NEET results on a batch of pleas alleging that a uniform question paper was not given in the examination and there was a vast difference between the ones in English and in Tamil.

The CBSE had said that due to the High Court order, the entire schedule of counselling and subsequent admission for medical courses through NEET has gone “haywire“.

Mr. Singh had told the apex court that out of the 12 lakh aspirants, around 10.5 lakh students have given the exam in either Hindi or English while around 1.25 lakh to 1.50 lakh students have appeared in eight vernacular languages.

He had said that a number of pleas had been filed in various high courts in NEET—related matters and high courts have entertained these petitions despite the apex court’s order that no other court shall hear such matters. He had also sought the transfer of petitions from various high courts to the apex court.

Mr. Singh had said that challenge to different sets of questions in vernacular languages were on wrong assumptions that they were difficult as experts had examined that they were different from those in English or Hindi medium but the level of difficulty cannot be said to be different.

He had said that questions were different to keep the larger interest protected on the grounds that if there was a leakage of a set of paper in a vernacular language, the majority of students would be protected as candidates appearing in any particular language were less than those opting for English or Hindi.

The Madras High Court had directed the Medical Council of India, the director of CBSE and the Union Health Ministry to file counter affidavits on these pleas pending before it.

The petitioners before the High Court demanded that the NEET 2017 be cancelled and a fresh exam with a uniform question paper be conducted.

They have claimed that different sets of question paper had been used at various places, though a common syllabus had been announced.

In Tamil Nadu, the question papers were different for those who opted English and Tamil and the one in Tamil was easier, they had claimed.

Top News Today

Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in


Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.