#MeToo: Ramani called me ‘sexual predator’ without any basis, M.J. Akbar tells court

Senior advocate further accused Priya Ramani of not telling the truth before the court

January 04, 2021 05:17 pm | Updated 05:17 pm IST - New Delhi

 M.J. Akbar. File

M.J. Akbar. File

Former union minister M.J. Akbar on Monday told a court in New Delhi that journalist Priya Ramani called him “media's biggest sexual predator” without any investigation or basis.

Mr Akbar made the submission through senior advocate Geeta Luthra during the final hearing in a criminal defamation complaint filed by him against Ms Ramani for allegedly defaming him by accusing him of sexual misconduct 20 years back.

Ms Ramani had made allegation of sexual misconduct against Mr Akbar in the wake of #MeToo movement in 2018.

Ms Luthra referred to Ms Ramani's tweet which accued Mr Akbar of being media's biggest sexual predator.

“If we look at what has been said, a conclusion is drawn that this is a predator. On what basis? All these averments (in the article) are based without any investigation or basis,” she submitted before Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Ravindra Kumar.

She further read Ms Ramani's “premature tweet” on Mr Akbar's resignation. “This had further tweets. In my (Akbar) cross examination I asked if this was not correct. He resigned later is wholly immaterial. This shows malafide, maliciousness.

“This is trial outside the court. Due process is in a court of law. One cannot become law onto oneself. This (the tweet) was incorrect,” she said.

The senior advocate further accused Ms Ramani of not telling the truth before the court.

“I asked did you issue any corrigendum. She said yes. I said show. She said I would show on the next date. This was not necessary. She knew she had not issued any corrigendum.

“She says her defense is truth but she knows it is not the truth. Only in cross examination she says it was not the truth. It shows her credibility as a witness,” Ms Luthra said.

She further said, “Can people repeat something incorrect? Repeating of lies by 10 persons doesn't become the truth. Being a journalist, she could have independently verified. This is how responsible journalism works.”

“A blatantly false, incorrect statement was made to court and a blatantly false defense was taken,” she said.

The court will further resume the hearing on January 7.

Mr Akbar had filed the criminal defamation complaint against Ms Ramani in October 15, 2018.

He resigned as Union minister on October 17, 2018.

Mr Akbar had earlier told the court that Ms Ramani had defamed him by calling him with adjectives such as 'media's biggest predator' that harmed his reputation.

He has denied all the allegations of sexual harassment against the women who came forward during #MeToo campaign against him.

Over 20 women came up with accounts of the alleged sexual harassment by Mr Akbar while they were working as journalists under him.

He termed the allegations “false, fabricated and deeply distressing” and said he was taking appropriate legal action against them.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.