Transgender Bill passed in Lok Sabha

December 17, 2018 05:29 pm | Updated December 04, 2021 10:42 pm IST - New Delhi

A view of the Lok Sabha during the Winter Session of Parliament in New Delhi.

A view of the Lok Sabha during the Winter Session of Parliament in New Delhi.

The Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Bill, 2016, which aims at defining the transgender people and prohibiting discrimination against them, was passed with 27 amendments in the Lok Sabha on Monday.

The Bill was introduced in the House two years ago.

The amendments moved by the government, along with some others moved by Opposition members, were considered.

Kakoli Ghosh Dastidar of the All-India Trinamool Congress said the bill was hastily drafted and the different clauses mentioned in it were totally inconclusive.

“First we have to define what transgender means....This Bill has to be returned,” she said, adding that a properly drafted Bill should be tabled.

Parliamentary Affairs Minister Narendra Singh Tomar said the government was ready was any kind of discussion.

Union Social Justice and Empowerment Minister Thawar Chand Gehlot said that the Bill was sent to standing committee and the government had accepted 27 amendments.

Earlier, seeking passage of the Bill, Mr. Gehlot had said the Bill was complete and there was no need for more discussion.

He said the objectives of the Bill includes protecting interests of the transgender people, defining of the term ‘transgender’, giving them recognition and setting up of a National Transgender Council.

“A long discussion has taken place on this issue. It has also gone to the parliamentary standing committee. We have included several of their suggestions,” he said.

Initiating the debate on the Bill, Congress member Shashi Tharoor said the Bill was “flawed” and the Minister should withdraw it.

“Defer consideration of the Bill as it needs serious discussion. I request the minister to withdraw the Bill,” he said. He said the government has “blindly” borrowed the definition of transgender.

“The Bill also fails to define discrimination against transgenders and there is a need to redraft certain clauses,” he said.

Bhatruhari Mahtab of the BJD said the definition of transgender was not complete and that other terms such as transmen and transwomen were not defined.

Supriya Sule of the NCP said a transgender commission at the national level was not enough. “We are asking for a welfare board for transgenders. They need equal rights,” she said, demanding a helpline number for the community.

( With PTI inputs )

Top News Today

Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in


Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.