Lockdown did not lead to marked improvement in river water quality: CPCB

The agency collects samples at designated periods and assesses them for various parameters

Published - September 24, 2020 04:53 am IST - NEW DELHI

A view of the Ganga River in Varanasi. photo used for representation purpose only.

A view of the Ganga River in Varanasi. photo used for representation purpose only.

The lockdown did not contribute to a “significant improvement” in water quality assessed in 19 major rivers of India, the Central Pollution Control Board has said in a report released on Wednesday. However nearly three in four water samples analysed met designated standards.

Previous analysis has shown that the lockdown helped majorly reduce air pollution in several cities.

Water samples were collected as part of the agency’s routine National Water Quality Monitoring programme, under which samples are collected at designated periods and assessed for parameters such as Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD, or the extent of microbial life); Dissolved Oxygen (DO, to judge the effect of organic pollutants), pH (acidity level), and faecal coliform (FC, or microbes from human and animal waste). These measurements are used to determine if the water conforms to bathing or drinking quality. For the purpose of the latest assessment, the CPCB only checked if the water was fit to bathe in.

In March, before the lockdown was announced, water samples from 387 monitored locations were gleaned and 299 of them (77.26 %) met bathing water criteria. In April — once the lockdown was in effect — it emerged that 277 of 365 locations monitored (75%) met the criteria. “This implies that there was no significant improvement in water quality of major rivers monitored in the country during the lockdown period,” the report notes.

Four rivers — Baitarani, Mahanadi, Narmada and Pennar — met standards both before and during lockdown. River Ghaggar met criteria during neither.

Seven rivers — Brahmani, Brahmaputra, Cauvery, Godavari, Krishna, Tapi and Yamuna — improved on water quality parameters from pre-lockdown to lockdown. This, the agency says, was likely due to a reduction in industrial effluent discharges in view of closure of almost all industries, no disposal of worshipped puja materials and garbage, no outdoor bathing, no washing of clothes and vehicles, no pilgrimage activities and a reduction in cattle movement for washing them in rivers.

Water quality declined in the two periods in five rivers — in the Beas, Chambal, Ganga, Sutlej and Swarnarekha. This was likely due to the discharge of untreated or partially treated sewage; lack of flow because of the dry season; and no fresh water discharges from the upstream.

Rivers that met compliance criteria were able to do so because they had adequate sewage treatment infrastructure in place and may have also had enough water to dilute the concentration of pollutants.

To be considered fit for bathing, a river must have a BOD of <3 milligram per litre, DO >5 milligram per litre, a pH from 6.5 to 8.5 and FC less than 2500 per 100 millilitre.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in


Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.