Uttarakhand glacier burst

Landslip, not glacial lake burst, probable trigger for Uttarakhand flood

Rescue operations underway at Tapovan Tunnel, after a glacier broke off in Joshimath causing a massive flood in Chamoli, on February 8, 2021.   | Photo Credit: PTI

Though the jury is still out, glaciologists and experts in rock sciences are converging around the view that the cause of the Chamoli deluge was most probably a landslip and not a glacial lake burst.

Glacial Lake Outburst Flooding (GLOF) occurs when a breach in the glacial lake causes an outpour downstream. Such lakes are formed when glaciers erode land, melt and over time become a large mass of water in the depression formed and these can be breached, causing floods downstream. However, several scientists based on an analysis of satellite images have failed to spot any such lakes.

Also read: Explained: How glaciers, glacial lakes form and why they break

The Central Water Commission monitors and prepares monthly reports on the state of glacial lakes and water bodies 10 hectares and above via satellite and nothing out of the ordinary was observed. However, it is possible that smaller pockets of water exist that haven’t been caught in the satellite images, that may have flooded. “There’s a bit of a mystery and it will be some time before the causes can be determined,” Sharat Chandra, Director, CWC told The Hindu.

The CWC constituted a team of experts on Monday to investigate the possible causes.

Also read: Uttarakhand glacier burst | Dhauliganga’s water level at Joshimath breaches records, say Central Water Commission

Other experts opine that large mass of rock or debris might have impacted the glacier and triggered an avalanche.

Watch | What is happening in Uttarakhand?

Extremely steep

Kalachand Sain, Director, Wadia Institute of Himalayan Geology, said apart from glacial lakes not being observed, the glaciers were extremely steep and preventing water from accumulating enough to form such lakes. “A sudden surge of water is surprising and had it been from a broken glacier, we would be seeing a continuous flow of water. Right now this appears to have stemmed,” he said.

Also read: Glacier burst: How a phone call saved their lives, recount survivors

On Monday morning, an official Twitter account of the CWC reported a “possible second wave of flood” in the early hours of Monday with water-flow monitors recording a surge and then again ebbing within an hour. “The second wave doesn’t seem concerning and as of now water levels are back to normal.”

The winter season would make it extremely hard and the ensuing damage to the connecting roadways make access difficult to reach the glaciers.

Satellite data observations showed that until February 6 there was significant snow but the cover appears to have significantly reduced the next day. “That’s surprising and what we need to find out. What caused this reduction? Did anything happen upstream? Did rocks or boulders fall on the glaciers causing an outpouring of sediment, debris....we need to figure out.”

Also read: Uttarakhand glacier burst: Death toll up to 26, rescue operation on in Chamoli

Mr. Sain said his colleagues — a team of five — were on the road to Joshimath, close to the spot, for further studies.

Dan Shugar, a geomorphologist at the University of Calgary, Canada, said on Twitter preliminary analysis of satellite imagery suggested that the event was a landslip. A part of a glacier — and Mr. Shugar suggested he is unsure if it is the Nandadevi glacier — may have broken off and become rock and ice avalanche that later turned into a flood.

Fracture of a hanging glacier

Mohd. Farooq Azam, Assistant Professor, Glaciology & Hydrology, IIT Indore, offered a hypothesis again ruling out a GLOF. “We can now say with some belief that the incident occurred due to the fracture of a hanging glacier [about 0.2 sq km in size] together with snow and rock avalanches, at 5,600 metre altitude near the Trishul Peak. Though it is hard to fully ascertain the source of the water and slurry which was seen in the videos yesterday [Sunday], our current hypothesis is that the water accumulated locked in the debris-snow below the glacier was released when the glacier-rock mass fell. This was a drop of almost 2 km before hitting marshy land. Since the temperature in the region is sub-zero, river level is much lower than it would be in the monsoon season.”

Since 2017, debris and snow had been accumulating at the bottom of the glacier. The stream flowing out from it earlier was very clear, but after 2017 the glacier stream has been hidden below the accumulated debris-snow. It was possible that the debris-snow would have been absorbing and collecting water coming from the upstream glaciers and that could have been released when the ice-rock avalanche hit it, Mr. Azam said.

Our code of editorial values

This article is closed for comments.
Please Email the Editor

Printable version | Jan 27, 2022 12:19:37 PM | https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/landslip-not-glacial-lake-burst-probable-trigger-for-uttarakhand-flood/article33784558.ece

In This Package
Uttarakhand glacier disaster: Death certificates may be issued for missing persons
Efforts continue: A new machine brought to Tapovan tunnel to carry out further drilling, at Joshimath on February 13, 2021.
Uttarakhand disaster | Police perform last rites of unidentified bodies in Chamoli
Uttarakhand disaster | 64 from Uttar Pradesh still missing
The Hindu Explains | Why are geologists worried about a slew of hydroelectric projects and environmental stress in Uttarakhand?
Uttarakhand flood disaster | Relief operation continues in Chamoli
Scientists uncertain about impact of budding pool in Uttarakhand flood zone
In Pictures | The aftermath of Uttarakhand glacier disaster
The agonising cost of ham-handed development
A resilient future for Uttarakhand
Data | Over 50,000 hectares of forest land in Uttarakhand diverted for various projects in last 30 years
Troubled mountains: On Uttarakhand glacier disaster
Uttarakhand floods: Amit Shah speaks to CM, assures help
Tracing the Ganga's intricate waterweb
Dams and damages
Glacier burst: IMD says no adverse weather over affected areas on Feb 7, 8
Armed forces move in to provide assistance in Uttarakhand
Uttarakhand glacier burst brings back memory of 2013 flash floods
Uttarakhand flood: 2019 study warned Himalayan glaciers melting at alarming speed
Uttarakhand glacier burst | Experts point to climate change impact
Uttarakhand glacier burst | Dhauliganga’s water level at Joshimath breaches records, say Central Water Commission
Uttarakhand glacier burst | Tapovan hydel project entirely washed away, says ITBP Officer
7 killed after ‘glacial burst’ in Uttarakhand
Uma Bharati recalls her warning on Uttarakhand hydel projects
Uttarakhand glacier burst: Death toll up to 26, rescue operation on in Chamoli
Explained: How glaciers, glacial lakes form and why they break
Uttarakhand glacier disaster | Avalanche damages a part of under-construction hydro plant in Tapovan: NTPC
Uttarakhand glacier disaster | ISRO, DRDO trying to ascertain exact cause, says CM
Story of the man in the viral Uttarakhand rescue photo
13 of 486 Uttarakhand glacial lakes vulnerable: GSI
Engineer from Kashmir among those missing in Uttarakhand
You are reading
Landslip, not glacial lake burst, probable trigger for Uttarakhand flood
Projects above an elevation of 2,200 metres recipe for disaster, say experts
Uttarakhand glacier disaster: A phone call that saved a dozen lives
Efforts on to find 35 labourers trapped in Uttarakhand tunnel
197 still missing as Uttarakhand avalanche toll touches 32
Floodlights are lit around the Tapovan tunnel area where rescuers are searching for trapped workers on February 9, 2021.
Uttarakhand flood | 71 from U.P. remain untraced
Uttarakhand flood | Families await reunion with loved ones trapped in tunnel
Next Story